Quote:
Originally Posted by Alo  I don't really disagree. My point was that it'd be a major mistake for St. Louis to pass on Suh just because they'd already drafted Carriker (injury-prone and not very productive when healthy) and Long (not very impressive) with #1's.
If they're truly convinced that Bradford or Clausen is a franchise QB, I could see taking either one of them ahead of Suh. To me, Bradford seems the more likely guy to earn #1 consideration, but his trouble with injuries and poise under pressure are worrisome. And you read stuff like this that makes you wonder whether he's truly #1 overall material: |
I'm personally on the Kiper side of the battle, where I think Clausen is undoubtedly the #1 QB prospect. He can make all the throws, knows what it's like in a pro-style offense, and can make plays. His pocket presence can be questioned, as his arm strength to get the ball down field, but he's got the highest ceiling, IMO. I think the Rams take him @ #1, while Detroit gets Suh, and TB takes Berry/McCoy.
Washington either goes Okung, Davis, or Bradford, KC goes Davis/Okung, Seattle takes Berry/Morgan, and the Browns take Berry/Haden/McClain.
I'll have a mock out in a week or so, hopefully. Been pretty busy.