Cleveland Browns' best choice at QB is Seneca Wallace or Colt McCoy, but not Jake Delhomme

[golfer704u]

Originally Posted by PlaygroundLegend

As I have learned in my Management class, you have two types of Managers and leaders

When you get to the REAL world you realize how silly all those things you learned in "management class" really were.

[Masters]

Originally Posted by Sez.EJ

Masters: your making my case for me.. He kept Hasselback from the prior system which Wallace fit very well.. So... It appears he just felt wallace was not good enough to keep around...even with the looming question of Hasselback's health..he still chose to lose wallace.

Experienced vet for Whithurst to learn from or back up QB with many less starts, and an expiring contract to learn behind? That's just common sense that you'd stick with Matt over Wallace as your bridge. It doesn't make any case for you. If SEA cut Wallace, you'd have a strong case. But all you really have is Wallace didn't have a future in SEA for any number of reasons. Obviously MH thought high enough of him to trade a draft pick to get him. SEA could have thought he was good, but not for what they wanted to do.

As to you other note on why MH wouldn't dictate down to play Wallace (and again I am only saying right now he seems to me to be the lesser of two evils between him and Jake with all the turn overs from Jake), probably because he has said from day one he won't do that. Would you want the president dictating to the HC who to play?

[Masters]

Originally Posted by golfer704u

When you get to the REAL world you realize how silly all those things you learned in "management class" really were.

+1,000

[Masters]

Jake is no longer "coming back" from Tommy John's surgery. He's three years removed from the surgery. But I do agree he has lost zip since having the surgery.

I'll take botched deep throws over no deep throws, pick sixes, and near pick sixes every day.