It seems that you are unregistered. Please register with us by clicking here.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Register | Arcade | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | ![]() |
| | | | |||||||
| The Cleveland Browns Place for all discussion about our beloved Browns. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
|
That looks exactly how I would have mine, except with Clausen @ 1 and Bradford at 4 or 6. If Washington does decide to go QB, then Seattle will go for an OT as a no brainer, IMO, although it's hard to tell. Point is, I think there's a pretty good chance that we can land Berry, however we must root for the Rams to take a QB, like I've been saying all along. If not, then the Bucs have a choice between Bryant, JPP, and Berry. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Also would make sense, especially if he can auction off Clausen/Bradford to a team worried about Seattle taking a QB at #6. Could be Buffalo trading up to get their guy. Or the Browns, for that matter. |
| ||||
|
Woohoo! I like the way you think, Aloysius, my brudda! Go land yourself that Great White Tackle Bulaga, Pioli! Yee ha! (Whoa. Watched too much Whale Wars yesterday. The hippy "pirates" are so damn stupid I started cheering for the whalers. Not to kill whales, mind you. I'm too PC for that.) |
| |||
| We did that. But the problem here for me is that would be a HUGE reach for Bulaga, as he is not (IMO, of course) in Thomas' class. So if they do want him, they'll trade down and someone who picks in that spot will not lose their collective mind and skip on Berry, Bradford, etc.
|
| |||
| Quote:
I was also considering tagging any post of mine that's obviously not "frustrating." |
| ||||
| Quote:
I wouldn't necessarily take Bulaga at #5, but I like him better as a left tackle than I do Tyson Jackson as a 3-4 end. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| 3-4, board, browns, cleveland, dez bryant, draft, eric berry, love, notre dame, offense, sam bradford, speed, thomas, trade |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |