It seems that you are unregistered. Please register with us by clicking here.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Register | Arcade | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | ![]() |
| | | | |||||||
| The Cleveland Browns Place for all discussion about our beloved Browns. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
|
If you don't have the quality of players to even field a defense that can keep you in a game Luck isn't the answer. Old, tired big money FAs isn't how you build a team. That said, if McCoy flops then you got the ammo to go get Luck. If you take Julio Jones you don't have a chance of getting Luck or the picks necessary to get younger, faster, stronger and meaner on defense. Old, fat and slow don't win in the NFL even with Andrew Luck. |
| ||||
|
NFL network was showing an interesting stat last night for each team while they were on the clock: number of players on the current roster, drafted by the team. I think it was Green Bay who had the most, at 39 players. How many did the Browns have? 21. To me, thats all the proof right there of why we made a good move yesterday. Of course, oddly enough the Bengals had 34, so I guess you still have to draft well..
|
| ||||
|
This year, the Browns went from three picks to three picks (prior to round 4). We'll have a low one and a pair of twos instead of 1/2/3. It's really, really tough to judge now, as Heck has said. If I judged it now, though? I'd hate it a lot, I admit. |
| ||||
| Quote:
It's a 1, a 2 and two 4's, a 5, two 6s and a 7 this year and two 1s a two and a 3 and two 4's plus 5, 6 and 7 and what we get in 2012 for Quinn. That's what it is. Is as much about two 1s and an extra 4 next year as it is about a 1, two 2s and two 4s this year vs a 1, 2 and 3. Especially if you are picking #6 and don't like the choice of players you have to give millions of guaranteed money to. It's not about scoring more points as the only answer. It's about building a team so when we score more points it will amount to wins because we have a defense to stop other teams. It isn't Arena football. Just score more points and that's the answer. You need defense in the NFL. 20 or 32 picks went for linemen. It isn't about skilled players only. |
| ||||
|
Y, go back and read your post. You just spent several paragraphs telling me what I think... and it's not what I think. You boiled it down to something not as smart as what I think so you could say it wasn't very smart. You're better than that. I was not locked in on Green or Jones... although I would've taken one or the other. We were the 30th rated passing team and 31st in scoring. We need to be way better, way more explosive on offense. There's really no opposing argument to that. It's incredibly important to this franchise, to McCoy, to Hillis... it's HUGE. So somebody wanting a #1 WR in this draft is being very, very logical. It would've made a ton of sense. However... it wasn't the only way to go, as I said repeatedly. We could've gone pass rusher in one, like Quinn. We could've taken Fairley, as BPP wanted. We could've gone WR, then DE, then 3-tech, my favorite draft. What we did was go from 6/37/70 to 21/37/59. That's what we did. If you wanna know what I think, stop asking yourself and ask me. I know it's harder than simply twisting my opinion but I honestly think you're up to it. I don't like what we did. You do. That's just fine. But let's be adults about it. Quote:
|
| ||||
| "Holmgren and Heckert are old school, build though the draft type guys." you say we are building through the draft y-town(old school)...yet we gave away a very early 3rd rounder.... is somehow good? Trying hard to follow the justification you present. |
| ||||
|
Look, everybody builds through the draft. We wouldn't have been LESS building through the draft if we didn't make that trade. Still three picks in the top three rounds, just different ones. If you're suggesting we're building by having more fourth round picks? Uhhhhh... okay? "Building through the draft" is like "trenches." It sounds kinda tough and gritty... but it doesn't mean shit. Everybody has players in the trenches. Everybody builds through the draft. Are we still slow on both sides of the ball? Yes. Have we done anything yet to score a lot more points? No. No disagreement on either of those. |
| |||
| Don't let consistency or logic get in the way of a good argument.
|
| ||||
| Quote:
Sorry man but I don't know where you are going with this before they even take their second pick. At the end of the draft is a time to critique it. Not after one pick. I don't think they traded up because they had dinner reservations and wanted to get out of there. I think they were a little closer to the action and a little more plugged in then any of us were. They wanted him and they went and got him. I'm sure they would have stayed still if they thought he would fall to them. Moving up to get the guy you want is building through the draft. they thought he was a better fit for the Browns then anybody else left on the board. Obviously they liked him better then Austin, Heyward or others. And, I'm sure they looked at their board and have players in mind for round two when they moved up to pick. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2012, board, browns, clausen, cleveland, cleveland browns, colt mccoy, defense, dez bryant, draft, fat, football, haden, hillis, holmgren, mangini, mccoy, nba, nfl, offense, position, prospects, record, superbowl, trade, ward |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.barkinghard.com/forums/cleveland-browns/37464-browns-make-statement.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Browns Make a Statement - Barking Hard - Cleveland Browns Forum | This thread | Refback | 04-30-2011 06:00 PM | |