Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown Warrior I guess, Sez. But both Hillis and Hardesty are really good receivers and Jackson doesn't seem like he really brings anything different |
Jackson brings a 3rd down back capability, so what are you talkin about?
Hillis and Hardesty are more alike than anything on the roster, so adding Jackson is very understandable.
Quick question: Do you know what Jackson does?
He isn't a Hillis (Ryan Grant) or Hardesty (James Starks) but he is a RB who can teach the WCO, while also being a very good 3rd down back.
All I want is for Hardesty to make shit happen so good that we wonder "WTF happened to Hillis"
Than towards the second half of the game/season we give them a full does of Hillis.
Could be fun!
But yeah not so much does Jackson bring what Hillis and Hardesty contribute. He is different. But then again I guess some writer didn't tell you what to think, so there you go.......
You're telling me that Jackson is the same product as Hillis/Hardesty? Huh? Please dude go back to the Yoga room.