It seems that you are unregistered. Please register with us by clicking here.
Barking Hard - Cleveland Browns Forum  
Go Back   Barking Hard - Cleveland Browns Forum > NFL > The Cleveland Browns
Click to log in with Facebook Barking Hard Fan Club Forum Group @ Twitter

The Cleveland Browns Place for all discussion about our beloved Browns.


Hillis and Cribbs Backfield

The Cleveland Browns


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
Riffer X's Avatar
Works for Vivid Entertainment
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,379
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 52
Riffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' memberRiffer X is a Barking Hard 'core' member
Default Hillis and Cribbs Backfield

Was just listening to Booms and Kiley and they brought this up, which is something I have wanted to do for awhile. This would be great in a two back set, giving options for quick Cribbs swing passes or Hills hitting off tackle etc.

I realized this is probably a pipe dream, but at least start giving us Hards and Hillis together. I see no reason why Marecic should even be playing right now over a potential weapon.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
Jax Dawg's Avatar
Dirty old squid
Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jax, FL area
Posts: 1,237
Rep Power: 22
Jax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond reputeJax Dawg has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Hell, even the brilliant mind of Tony Grossi (cough, cough) has wanted Cribbs in the backfield...At this point in his development what's there to lose? Cribbs works best in space and a dump off out in the flat or get a blocker or two out there for a HB screen - TD!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
Masters's Avatar
Senior Member
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Posts: 4,172
Rep Power: 30
Masters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond repute
Default

What allignment are you going to put them in? It's not going to work out out of the I or the offset I. Not unless Hillis is now the FB. You can do it with the split, but frankly running out of the split isn't very likely and usually not productive because the back has to come all the way across the formation.

This just sounds Madden-esc to me. If you want to use Cribbs out of the backfield then you do it as single back or him as the RB with the FB in.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,253
Rep Power: 36
golfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Masters View Post
What allignment are you going to put them in? It's not going to work out out of the I or the offset I. Not unless Hillis is now the FB. You can do it with the split, but frankly running out of the split isn't very likely and usually not productive because the back has to come all the way across the formation.

This just sounds Madden-esc to me. If you want to use Cribbs out of the backfield then you do it as single back or him as the RB with the FB in.

I'd say BOTH. In the I or Offset I, yes Hillis is the FB, the you're right the few times you run the split they are interchangeable.

Again for me this comes down to the question of Do you want to win NOW, or do you want to develop your team for the future?

If you want to win more now, you do this with Hillis as the FB, because Marecic isn't even blocking that well which is his job as the FB. I think Hillis would be better at that. But if you are looking to properly deveop this offense, then Marecic has to be the FB and learn to do his job in this offense better.
__________________
"You can spout all you want about 'facts' and you can stroke your ego by thinking you know oh so much more about football than anyone else...or you can get your head out of your ass and realize that your opinion is worth what I paid for it. Nothing. Just the same as mine." -HIGHWAYGAL
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
Legacy Fan's Avatar
Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,203
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 24
Legacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond reputeLegacy Fan has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Ive been wanting Cribbs in the backfield since I wanted him paired with the Ghost.

Definitely split back. Put colt in the shotgun where he is actually comfortable/ effective.
Could look option-y but just hand off, or hit the slants from the gun. WCO. BOOM
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,253
Rep Power: 36
golfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I definitely think Cribbs should be in the backfield more in the shotgun. Somehow I think he could pick up a blitz, and the screen quick hit options to him would be great.

Now, one fo the problems with that this week is that Momass is still concussed a bit, So you kind of need Cribbs as a WR more.
__________________
"You can spout all you want about 'facts' and you can stroke your ego by thinking you know oh so much more about football than anyone else...or you can get your head out of your ass and realize that your opinion is worth what I paid for it. Nothing. Just the same as mine." -HIGHWAYGAL
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
Enigmatic Evil's Avatar
Conspiracy Theorist
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 3,086
Blog Entries: 16
Rep Power: 37
Enigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Cribbs has always been a conundrum for the offensive minds that have ran this team, nobody's really been able to get the most out of Cribbs, for better or worse. I think lining him up on the backfield would be a surefire statement to the opposition D, "The ball is going to this guy." it would make him an instant target, IMO. Someone D's would have to trigger in on, I think when you line him up on the outside as a WR, he doesnt' carry that same clout IMO.
__________________
BROWNS 2012: Its Weeden's job to lose, it was the second we took him #22 overall.
We had a pretty good draft, and I'd like to start seeing some results.
Fans already looking to next year and I don't blame them.
I think we will have things to be excited about that we lacked last year and we have some real facepalm moments just like last year.
It's going to be tough.
We aren't Barking Hard for nothing.
WOOF WOOF WOOF!

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,253
Rep Power: 36
golfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond reputegolfer704u has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigmatic Evil View Post
Cribbs has always been a conundrum for the offensive minds that have ran this team, nobody's really been able to get the most out of Cribbs, for better or worse. I think lining him up on the backfield would be a surefire statement to the opposition D, "The ball is going to this guy." it would make him an instant target, IMO. Someone D's would have to trigger in on, I think when you line him up on the outside as a WR, he doesnt' carry that same clout IMO.
That's why you have to do it more consistantly and not just as a gimmick play. again that's why I say you'd have to just pretty much sit marecic for 90% of plays. But also with the shotgun formation. He could block some downs and release into a pass pattern for others. again, if tyhat means the defense keeps a coverage guy on him while he stays in to block, all the better.
__________________
"You can spout all you want about 'facts' and you can stroke your ego by thinking you know oh so much more about football than anyone else...or you can get your head out of your ass and realize that your opinion is worth what I paid for it. Nothing. Just the same as mine." -HIGHWAYGAL
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
Senior Member
3rd string
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 483
Rep Power: 10
Bronx Cheer has much to be proud ofBronx Cheer has much to be proud ofBronx Cheer has much to be proud ofBronx Cheer has much to be proud ofBronx Cheer has much to be proud ofBronx Cheer has much to be proud ofBronx Cheer has much to be proud ofBronx Cheer has much to be proud ofBronx Cheer has much to be proud of
Default

I, and many others, have been saying for years that his best role would be as a Dave Meggett type. Slot WR and third down back. For whatever reason, perhaps because his size is good enough to line up outside, the brass has been hesitant to use him as such. He would abuse LB, nickel, and safety coverage, and not have the problem of having to run crisp routes.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
Greythan's Avatar
Senior Member
Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 1,595
Rep Power: 28
Greythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond reputeGreythan has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I've been a huge fan of the Cribbs at halfback scenario. Especially with Hillis as the other halfback. Meaning, I wouldn't ever run a traditional "I" formation with those two. Split them, let them block for each other, etc. I'm also willing to bet that Cribbs would flat out blow up guys blitzing. Cribbs is a super physical guy who plays bigger than his listed height/weight.

On passing downs this RB duo would be flat out nightmarish for defenses. Both can stay in to pick up blitzes. Both are major threats to catch/run. Both are threats on draw plays.

I'm not sure why we haven't done it. Must be some pretty damn good reasons I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
TheBestPlayersPlay's Avatar
Die-Hard
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 3,358
Blog Entries: 3
Rep Power: 33
TheBestPlayersPlay has disabled reputation
Default

Most of us have been saying for years Cribbs would be special as a RB. His college coach said he would have been drafted day 1 had he played RB rather than QB @ Kent St.

Don't know why every coach we have refuses to hand the ball to the guy, his acceleration is out of this world, his legs are like tree trunks, and his heart is unquestioned.


Especially now that we have stopped focusing on making special teams great, and taken that away from Cribbs ...give him the damn ball and let him work.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2011
Masters's Avatar
Senior Member
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Posts: 4,172
Rep Power: 30
Masters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond reputeMasters has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Problem is the split formation is a terrible formation to actually run out of. Most teams know you are not running when in the split back formation. To run out of the split back formation the guy running is going to be lined up slightly more forward, which tips the play to the D. Additionally when running out of that formation the runner has to come across the formation which means the runner is hitting the line and the hole much later. It's why you rarely see teams actually run out of that formation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2011, blitz, browns, cleveland, cleveland browns, cleveland.com, college, combine, cribbs, defense, draft, football, gmat, hardesty, health, hillis, josh cribbs, love, madden, mccoy, mitchell, nfl, offense, position, safety, season, shurmur, special teams, speed, ward, wco

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 AM.


plush
no new posts
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0