It seems that you are unregistered. Please register with us by clicking here.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Register | Arcade | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | ![]() |
| | | | |||||||
| The Cleveland Browns Place for all discussion about our beloved Browns. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
|
He'd be perfect for this offense, is young, and no longer fits in in Chicago. Could we get him for a three????? He's exactly what we're looking for (unless you are an Evan Moore for President kind of guy). Quote:
|
| ||||
| Quote:
we just signed Watson who is good and better what is the objective to overpay two better than average TE's???????????
__________________ Offense wins Championships, OL guys are a Dime a Dozen |
| |||
|
I'm far from sold on Evan Moore. Estandia is nada. Watson is a short-term fix. Olsen is a long-term solution. If we could get him for one of our third-round picks then I'd be all for it.
|
| ||||
|
I'm with Rich on this one, go with what you got for another year and see how these guys pan out. We are always so quick to count guys out for proven names but forget that everybody comes from somewhere. Moore showed some really good promise and we have plenty of other needs than to go after another TE for a third.
__________________ |
| ||||
|
If you listened to the presser when these guys took over, Heckert addressed what they were going to do in the draft and a lot of it was predicated on what they do in FA. He basically said needs addressed there will create opportunities in the draft to go after other needs. I kinda thought this was common sense???
__________________ |
![]() |
| Tags |
| draft, injury, love, nfl, offense, peyton manning, position, president, scheme, tight end, trade |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |