It seems that you are unregistered. Please register with us by clicking here.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Register | Arcade | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | ![]() |
| | | | |||||||
| The Cleveland Browns Place for all discussion about our beloved Browns. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Quote:
-jj Last edited by jason j; 02-06-2012 at 10:22 AM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
In the immortal words of Henny Youngman, "Take my Momass, please."
__________________ |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ |
| ||||
|
If we don't go up to get RG3, or if we play chicken and try to let him fall to us, we really should move DOWN again and pick up picks and bodies. There's no one at #4 that jumps out at me. I think there are multiple WRs will have careers equal to or greater than Blackmon to be had later in the first (Wright, Floyd, etc.). We also need way too much to target a non-elite talent at 4. Let someone else, like the Raiders or Skins, pay us and come up there to take their risks. Because if we don't go up for RG3, that means we're going to simply continue to stock the roster with talent. Nothing wrong with that strategy but it means another brutal year on offense with either Colt or whomever they bring in to compete with Colt. So if we're not going for the franchise-defining move for RG3, we have to just keep filling the roster, slowly but surely. |
| |||
| In short : 1) unequivocally yes, and 2) better than McCoy long term (2013 and beyond), and possibly even in 2012 given that opposing Ds wouldn't be able to stack 9 in the box and take away simultaneously the entire running game and passing game by stopping TE drag routes.
|
| |||
| Quote:
Likewise, I wouldn't have swapped out McCoy for any of last season's crop of rookies. There's just not enough separation. -jj |
| |||
|
As you can see, I am in the "Defenses figured out McCoy club." He could be a good backup, but I just think he is too physically limited to be a successful long term starter. I'd much rather have a league-average stopgap starting (plus a developmental type on the bench whose upside is starting calibre) than waste another season polishing up a career backup. Foles, Tannehill, and Griffin all have significantly higher ceilings than McCoy, so I'd come to peace with any of them being tabbed as our 2013 guy. I just happen to like the value rice ratio for Foles (early 3rd?) a lot better than those for Tannehill (mid first) and Griffin (trade up to #2 overall).My first choice would be to mortgage the farm for Luck, but that doesn't even seem to be possible in my wildest dreams. Last edited by Bronx Cheer; 02-06-2012 at 01:34 PM. |
| |||
|
Yeah, Luck's not happening in Cleveland. Griffin is a real possibility. Depending on where Foles ends up, he could be a value. The trouble with Nick is he has a lot more to learn about playing quarterback. He's not demonstrated that he's a good decision maker. Now some of that could be on the coaching staff. Early reports were Foles was limited in his decision-making, and frankly not very bright. The Senior Bowl staff found him to be a reasonably quick study. So there you go. He may find a ceiling in just how much data he can process. But there's a lot to like. He's got an arm commensurate with his frame. He's heavy-footed, and a strong kid. But man oh man that delivery needs to be tightened up. He's got a pretty sizable wind up on most throws... and from time to time does this weird hip dip to get into his motion. No kidding, the kid's 6'5" and will uncork throws from about a 5'8" arm slot. But, it's not consistent... or "And," it's not consistent. It just really hard to tell what is "uncoachable" and what's just not been coached. He's one of those guys that when he's tight with his mechanics, he looks good. You watch him make a half dozen throws and your comments column looks something like: Wow Nice velocity On target What the hell was that? Nice touch WTFWHTT (shorthand for "Where the F*** was he throwing that?") He's a coach's dream or nightmare. He's got a lot to work with... but it's going to be a lot of work. I think he's ideal in a situation with an older (say early 30's) vet where he can sit for a few years. New Orleans, Dallas, Giants, Houston. Any one of them could be a good spot for Foles to sit. I'd be afraid if he comes to Cleveland, that he may be pressed into duty. And I just don't think he's equipped for it. -jj |
| |||
| I definitely understand that, and agree. The only way I see him as an attractive option is if we can get a vet guy in here capable of holding down the fort for a few seasons.
|
| ||||||||||
|
This guy listed as a riser in the draft:
This guy listed as a possible faller in the draft
I am notREAL familiar with Randall.. but have heard of him..but SEC guys can usually play and play well. Possiblity with that 2nd 1st rounder or 2nd round pick.
__________________ *************************** Individuals win trophies. TEAMS win Championships! |
| ||||
|
A WR to look at after the first round beside Randall who would be a great fit at #37 if we get shut out on day one. Joe Adams, fast, quick and runs good routes. Had a good senior bowl and should rise up boards after the combine. Some are saying he could outrun Wright at the combine.
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2011, 2012, board, browns, cleveland, coaching, college, combine, cornerback, defense, draft, football, free agency, free agent, free agents, greg little, hillis, joe, lecharles bentley, love, mccoy, mike williams, nfl, notre dame, offense, passing, peyton manning, position, prospects, quarterback, raiders, redskins, season, senior bowl, speed, texans, trade, ward, weed |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |