It seems that you are unregistered. Please register with us by clicking here.
Barking Hard - Cleveland Browns Forum  
Go Back   Barking Hard - Cleveland Browns Forum > NFL > The Cleveland Browns
Click to log in with Facebook Barking Hard Fan Club Forum Group @ Twitter

The Cleveland Browns Place for all discussion about our beloved Browns.


Joe Haden

The Cleveland Browns


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2010
Enigmatic Evil's Avatar
Conspiracy Theorist
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 2,673
Blog Entries: 13
Rep Power: 32
Enigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond reputeEnigmatic Evil has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I am excited to see him suit up in the brown and orange and put all the discussion to rest, I think it's only a matter of time before Haden's play in the pre-season causes everyone to go "THAT is why we took him at #7". We took the BPA at a position of great need as many others have pointed out. Was he the 'safe' pick? You bet your ass he was but the fact of the matter was Haden's rank among his position had far more clout than any top level QB's in this years draft had in their position (or other Positions of need, like WR, for example).
__________________
BROWNS 2012: To The Draft... AND BEYOND!
In my opinion, if we're replacing Colt McCoy, you aim higher than Colt... Flynn or RGIII don't really give me that warm and fuzzy feeling.
WOOF WOOF WOOF!
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2010
Flugel's Avatar
Senior Member
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,156
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 45
Flugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' memberFlugel is a Barking Hard 'core' member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBrowns41 View Post
Exactly right, Tom.

People just need to realize that the sexy picks don't always cut it.

Haden was the most talented player at a position we had a great need for.

His ability to change direction, as well as his footwork, and collegiate stats (never gave up a TD), all speak of what this kid is made of.

Is it Berry? No.

Is it Bradford? No.

If you ask me to go back and take Adrian Peterson instead of Joe Thomas right now, I'd still say no, even after seeing what AP could do at the Pro level.

Some people just need to realize that sexy picks aren't always going to cut it. How well did Braylon and Kellen Winslow work out for us? What about Fast Willy Green?

Kamerion Wimbley was a reach at his spot because the coaches thought they saw something in him nobody else did. They thought they were getting that steal in the top end of the first in one of the four core positions.

The list truly goes on.
You make some very good points DaBrowns! I also like what EE says about BPA. We needed a pick of the litter at one of our perceived weaknesses. While WR was thought to be a weakness heading into the draft - last year it was supposed to be a strength with a very high paid former first round FA Stallworth and Edwards. They both boned us and we were left with inexperience. It's tough to make conclusions beyond inexperience and QB issues for the WR position. Just because we refrained from starting Robiskie as a second ROOKIE starter at WR - doesn't mean he's gonna suck. Miles Austin had 5 receptions as a rookie while Robert Meachem had 1 catch for 20 yards for New Orleans. BOTH got considerably better with experience.

As for the QB position, Holmgren looked like the only brass leader trying to make a deal for Bradford and after that he felt like everyone else wasn't worthy of excitement before round 3.

I last posted in this thread on April 24th before going back to re-watch the youtube highlights of Haden from this thread. I re-posted yesterday because I'd really like people to watch that video. I think you can just click on the reply I made to Alo yesterday where it says youtube in his comments I extratced (in grey) without searching through all the pages again. It's impressive. That's what he looks like in pads behind a pass rush instead of in shorts and t-shirts where QBs can take longer without any blitzing to contend with. Try to remember Northcutt used to be the superstar every May and June when they didn't have the pads on yet. When it was time to suit up - he couldn't get off the line of scrimmage so we had to burn 2 more 2nd round draft picks on Quincy Morgan and Andre Davis. Hopefully, Haden is just the opposite. Our defense is going to rotate people at almost every position so it's not gonna be as bad as people think if Haden begins as a 3rd corner. If Anthony Henry could snag us 10 INTs from that role as a rookie - it means there's considerable playing time in that capacity. It also meant that role was VITAL to our defense leading the AFC in INTs in 2001.
- Tom F.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2010
mz. mz. is offline
Banned
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Municipal Flat Block 18A, Linear North
Posts: 3,540
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 0
mz. has much to be proud ofmz. has much to be proud ofmz. has much to be proud ofmz. has much to be proud ofmz. has much to be proud ofmz. has much to be proud ofmz. has much to be proud ofmz. has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alo View Post
By the way, I came back to Haden as an option at #7 after I went back and studied Kareem Jackson & came to the conclusion that he wasn't nearly as good as Haden.

So the "we could've gotten Kareem Jackson later" argument doesn't sway me. And I'm not sure what happened with Kyle Wilson: could have been an injury issue, could have been concerns about there being almost no tape of him facing high-caliber wideouts (Haden faced top-flight guys almost every week in the SEC, and he shut them down).
Perhaps Haden wasn't the only fresh meat CB struggling after all:

Quote:
I wasn't in great position to see 11 on 11s today, but Kareem Jackson still looks rough. Got beat deep by Dickerson, dropped an INT.
via here
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
adrian peterson, blitz, board, bradford, brandon mcdonald, braylon edwards, browns, cleveland, cleveland browns, college, combine, cornerback, defense, draft, eric berry, florida, football, forum, funny, gmat, haden, holmgren, injury, jets, joe thomas, love, mangini, media, nfl, nfl draft, offense, position, press conference, prospects, quarterback, robiskie, safety, scheme, sheldon brown, speed, tebow, thomas, trade, video, ward, wimbley, youtube

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 AM.


plush
no new posts
Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0