It seems that you are unregistered. Please register with us by clicking here.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Register | Arcade | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | ![]() |
| | | | |||||||
| The Cleveland Browns Place for all discussion about our beloved Browns. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| |||
|
Yeah Shep, as you can read this was clearly not your most well thought out position. Complaining because we're strong @ CB? God forbid we have 3 good CB's. But absent Haden, I'd like to known your starting 3 CB's. Keep in mind Wilson was off the board @ 38. |
| |||
|
Tom, where did I say I would be more comfortable "with the latter three?" The point is that we made a terrific veteran pickup prior to the draft in Sheldon Brown. Brown and Wright are a very good set of starting corners. On top of that, I would have happily used a 2nd or 3rd on a corner. Guys, you all struggle to debate/disagree without turning douchey. If you think I'm the only one questioning whether Haden was a great value pick for the Browns after signing Sheldon Brown, you're fooling yourself. It was not a highly trumpeted pick. You can make a solid supportive rationale, but you still end up with this: We're talking about making Haden the first top 10 corner in five years... and chances are he won't even start. I feel pretty strongly that for a corner to be worthy of a #7 pick, he has to be absolutely epic. And that would include being good enough to start his rookie year, like Revis. Otherwise, he should've been picked later in the round, like Kyle Wilson and Kareem McKenzie. OF COURSE I thought out my position, and it's a very strong one, Veg. You guys are coming from a nonepistemic place of WANTING to love the pick. Prior to the draft, I'd say Haden was the favorite pick of about 10% of this board at best. Only AFTER the pick did he become popular. I get it. It's the commitment to approval of your favorite teams moves. But I'd be a hypocrite if I said I liked the choice. But please understand... I would have picked a corner somewhere pretty early in the draft. Who did I want? In a trade down, some names that really appeal to me would've been Dez Bryant, Ryan Matthews, Kyle Wilson, Brandon Graham, and, yes, Jimmy Clausen. We would have probably added an extra 3rd, meaning we probably get a pretty serious DL or OLB in addition to what we got. I have this feeling that taking Bryant or Matthews at 7 instead of Haden won't look so crazy by the end of the year. But I understand that it would have looked nutty in April. I think Haden ends up being a very good cornerback. But for me, that won't justify a #7 pick. He needs to be a Pro Bowler in year two... and then for the next five years, too. We need to see him as a vital piece of the championship puzzle. He needs to be spoken of in the same breath as Revis. So we'll see. |
| ||||
|
Nice piece about this on ClevelandBrowns.com Quote:
The first, that Joe Haden sought him out and immediately was looking for input is telling of the type of player we drafted. That all 3 of our new DB's willing to listen and are flying around gives us a hope that the backfield will be much improved this year. The second, about Wright, makes you feel good about him...but hidden (not anymore) in the comment was the fact that MOST CB'S DO NOT START THEIR FIRST YEAR!!! In other words, guys like Revis not only are special players, but are put into a particular SITUATION that forces them to start every down. It is not the norm for that to happen. So, the fact that Haden has the OPPORTUNITY to learn under a guy like Brown and grow into the position without getting burned immediately (like McDonald) is a BONUS for the Browns. The fact Brown is the type that can eventually go S if needed is even more of a bonus. Our first round pick was a solid pick that is going to pay benefits for years to come...and the situation, for ONCE, is the RIGHT SITUATION for growth.
__________________ A bad player makes the players around him worse. A great player makes the players around him better. Replace a bad player with a great player and watch 3 or more players improve. |
| |||
| C'mon. You're being disagreed with, not spitballed. Embrace it.
|
| ||||
|
I'm not being nasty - just stating the obvious. You wanted Bryant and Clausen, each of whom had maturity/attitude concerns. Turning around now and saying we should have traded down & drafted a whole different set of guys seems odd. And a little too convenient, given that most of them landed in close to ideal situations (Mathews as the feature back in SD, Graham as an end in Philly's attacking defense, etc.). |
| |||
|
Nothing odd at all. I just don't like our first round pick. And I don't think Matthews is any more suited to be a feature back in San Diego than in Cleveland. Or that Dez Bryant will be any less or more an imposing WR in Dallas than anywhere else. And I think Brandon Graham could be a 3-4 OLB for sure. And I don't think there's any huge guarantee of who will end better, Haden, Wilson, McKenzie, or McCourty. To me personally, they all felt like first round types, but in the 14-28 range. Not #7. Just me, though. I totally respect that you and others disagree. |
| ||||
| Yahoo's Jason Cole wrote the following as part of his Draft Week Inconvenient Truths piece: Quote:
Quote:
As I've said before, I came back to Haden at #7 after I studied Kareem Jackson closely. Though they're both physical corners, Jackson lacks the explosive burst that Haden possesses. And while Jackson timed better in Indy, he's the one I saw get beat deep, not Haden. Wilson had some injury concerns that dropped his stock; McShay alluded to it and nfldraftscout's Chad Reuter confirmed it after the draft. Also, he lacks Haden's length, which could become an issue when he's matched up against big, physical receivers. If you watched Haden match up against Bama's Julio Jones (6'4", 210 lbs.), you know that's Joe's forte. I liked McCourty a lot, especially with his added special teams value, but he too struggles to match up against big, physical wideouts. And he lacks exceptional ball skills. Based on studying these guys, I think there's good reason to believe that Haden is a step above the other corners in this draft. No sure thing, but I like the odds. But if you approach things with a predetermined distaste for taking Haden at #7, I could see why you would think all the corners are of approximately equal caliber. |
| |||
| Quote:
BTW, Alo's post above is excellent. Thats why he's by far the smartest guy on this board. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| 3-4, adrian peterson, aints, awesome, blitz, board, bradford, brady quinn, brandon mcdonald, braylon edwards, browns, california, clausen, cleveland, cleveland browns, coaching, college, combine, cornerback, defense, delhomme, dez bryant, draft, eric berry, eric mangini, florida, football, forum, free agency, funny, gmat, god, holmgren, injured, injury, jets, joe thomas, love, mangini, mccoy, media, music, nfl, nfl draft, offense, ohio state, peyton manning, pictures, pittsburgh steelers, politics, position, probowl, prospects, quarterback, record, redskins, rob ryan, robiskie, safety, saints, sam bradford, scheme, shaun rogers, sheldon brown, special teams, speed, superbowl, tebow, thomas, tight end, trade, wallace, youtube |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |