Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 241 to 260 of 260

Thread: Bengals week!

  1. #241
    nickers's Avatar
    nickers is online now Muffin Utility Research Kitchen Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In Da City!
    Posts
    5,934
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    " There are no old running QB's in the NFL " ~ Sam Rutigliano. "
    I pray someone takes a stack of SPARQ stats, and shoves them up smug Sashi Browns tight asshole" ~TBPP



    Its Offense baby!!!!!" "ITS
    OFFENSE!!!!!

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    193
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My Manziel observations

    - I had not noticed in the NYJ or Titans game but it deserves mentioning that Johnny has abandoned the wristband playcard, which is a clear indication that he knows the offense, is comfortable commanding the huddle, and understands the nuances of the playcalling.

    - Johnny continued to use his feet to setup his arm. It was rather obvious that the Bengals were going to pressure him in the first half and Johnny adeptly bought himself time while continuing to scan the field and delivering very impressive passes on the run. When he did run, Manziel ran with a purpose and competitiveness, as evidenced by his 3rd down scamper that came up just short of a first down after booth review.

    - The second half numbers, especially those passes thrown within the pocket, appear woeful but do not tell the entire story. If Gabriel and others do not drop however many passes the narrative changes from 40 yards and a poor completion percentage to 100+ yards and a more acceptable completion percentage.

    - Manziel needs to learn when to dial back the velocity on his throws. Sure, an NFL receiver needs to catch anything within their general vicinity, however Johnny is not doing them any favors when he's driving the ball with an unnecessary amount of force. Last season, Johnny threw and INT as a result of not threading the football on a rope and I have a feeling that the high velocity of his throws might have been his attempt to prohibit this sort of error. As Johnny gains experience he'll need to place more touch on his passes within the context of each attempt. That being said, I don't think anyone could help but be impressed with Manziel's arm strength.

    - There was not much of a pocket for Johnny to step up into in the second half, as evidenced by the sacks taken. In fact, the announcing crew seemed bewildered that no playaction was utilized to allow time for a deep route to unfold.

    - Turnovers: I noticed better ball security while scrambling and being sacked. With regards to his passing, throughout his collegiate career I had always been amazed with Manziel's incredible ability to avoid throwing interceptions while directing a seemingly aggressive and risky aerial attack. Due to these observations I was a bit confused last season when Manziel seemed rather reckless with his passes and was intercepted a few times during his brief appearances. This season I'm happy to see that Johnny seems much more intentional and accurate with regards to where he is delivering the football. Last night I saw crisp, accurate passes and even those timing throws seemed well-placed, in which he attempted to fit the ball into tight coverage only to result in pass breakups. I did not particularly enjoy the past play of the game in which he was nearly intercepted but I also realize that he had nothing to lose and it was essentially a throw-away play. In totality, I was pleased with his ability to limit turnovers.

    - I am not as down on Pettine as many here are, nor am I down on Flip, who I'd imagine has more input on offensive scheming. That being said, I am not sure why the Browns did not employ more of a moving pocket for Johnny through which he'd have more time to operate within. Many of the NFL's best quarterbacks, regardless of their mobility, suffer behind poor offensive lines and their respective teams look to minimize this deficiency by moving the pocket and consequently, the target of the pass rush. It would seem natural to roll Johnny out much.

    - The Browns want Manziel to develop into a pocket passer that has the ability to make plays on the run when plays break down; I get it. However, there comes a point by which an acknowledgement should be made that a player can develop that part of his game with it not being force-fed to deleterious effect. Johnny didn't appear particularly horrible to me from within the pocket, however I saw that this pocket was being blown up very quickly and the offense lacked the weapons to capitalize with quick hits. Hell, the Browns are comfortable working predominantly out of the shotgun, which is not necessarily traditional, so why make pocket-play the offense's hill to die on?

    - The skill position talent is brutal. I wont repeat what has been stated on Barking Hard ad nauseam, but there is so little separation, blocking, catching, etc.

    I said it after the New York Jets game and I'll say it again; if you watched last night's game and don't think that Johnny Manziel is an NFL quarterback in some capacity then I don't know what to tell you. Intelligence, arm strength, accuracy, improvisational skills...they were on display. Was it a polished product? Of course not. However, at 22 years old and in consideration from last year's improvement to this year, I'll take my chances with developing Manziel going forward.

    What I find amusing is that the critical narrative of Manziel continues to evolve. Last year we heard that Johnny would be out of the NFL within two years. Then, Johnny might be a backup quarterback. Now, Johnny has some work to do before becoming a serviceable starting QB. Hopefully, next we'll hear those questioning if Johnny can be a playoff quarterback and then if he can be elite and then if he can win a Superbowl.

    So...would I prefer to have Manziel start going forward? Selfishly, yes. But if I were patient I'd completely agree with others including BDU who rightfully point out that trotting JM2 out every Sunday to take a beating and throw fastballs careening off of elves might not tell us much, if anything, about his long-term potential within a productive team environment that we hope to foster going forward.

  3. #243
    nickers's Avatar
    nickers is online now Muffin Utility Research Kitchen Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In Da City!
    Posts
    5,934
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NGgator60 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    My Manziel observations

    - I had not noticed in the NYJ or Titans game but it deserves mentioning that Johnny has abandoned the wristband playcard, which is a clear indication that he knows the offense, is comfortable commanding the huddle, and understands the nuances of the playcalling.

    - Johnny continued to use his feet to setup his arm. It was rather obvious that the Bengals were going to pressure him in the first half and Johnny adeptly bought himself time while continuing to scan the field and delivering very impressive passes on the run. When he did run, Manziel ran with a purpose and competitiveness, as evidenced by his 3rd down scamper that came up just short of a first down after booth review.

    - The second half numbers, especially those passes thrown within the pocket, appear woeful but do not tell the entire story. If Gabriel and others do not drop however many passes the narrative changes from 40 yards and a poor completion percentage to 100+ yards and a more acceptable completion percentage.

    - Manziel needs to learn when to dial back the velocity on his throws. Sure, an NFL receiver needs to catch anything within their general vicinity, however Johnny is not doing them any favors when he's driving the ball with an unnecessary amount of force. Last season, Johnny threw and INT as a result of not threading the football on a rope and I have a feeling that the high velocity of his throws might have been his attempt to prohibit this sort of error. As Johnny gains experience he'll need to place more touch on his passes within the context of each attempt. That being said, I don't think anyone could help but be impressed with Manziel's arm strength.

    - There was not much of a pocket for Johnny to step up into in the second half, as evidenced by the sacks taken. In fact, the announcing crew seemed bewildered that no playaction was utilized to allow time for a deep route to unfold.

    - Turnovers: I noticed better ball security while scrambling and being sacked. With regards to his passing, throughout his collegiate career I had always been amazed with Manziel's incredible ability to avoid throwing interceptions while directing a seemingly aggressive and risky aerial attack. Due to these observations I was a bit confused last season when Manziel seemed rather reckless with his passes and was intercepted a few times during his brief appearances. This season I'm happy to see that Johnny seems much more intentional and accurate with regards to where he is delivering the football. Last night I saw crisp, accurate passes and even those timing throws seemed well-placed, in which he attempted to fit the ball into tight coverage only to result in pass breakups. I did not particularly enjoy the past play of the game in which he was nearly intercepted but I also realize that he had nothing to lose and it was essentially a throw-away play. In totality, I was pleased with his ability to limit turnovers.

    - I am not as down on Pettine as many here are, nor am I down on Flip, who I'd imagine has more input on offensive scheming. That being said, I am not sure why the Browns did not employ more of a moving pocket for Johnny through which he'd have more time to operate within. Many of the NFL's best quarterbacks, regardless of their mobility, suffer behind poor offensive lines and their respective teams look to minimize this deficiency by moving the pocket and consequently, the target of the pass rush. It would seem natural to roll Johnny out much.

    - The Browns want Manziel to develop into a pocket passer that has the ability to make plays on the run when plays break down; I get it. However, there comes a point by which an acknowledgement should be made that a player can develop that part of his game with it not being force-fed to deleterious effect. Johnny didn't appear particularly horrible to me from within the pocket, however I saw that this pocket was being blown up very quickly and the offense lacked the weapons to capitalize with quick hits. Hell, the Browns are comfortable working predominantly out of the shotgun, which is not necessarily traditional, so why make pocket-play the offense's hill to die on?

    - The skill position talent is brutal. I wont repeat what has been stated on Barking Hard ad nauseam, but there is so little separation, blocking, catching, etc.

    I said it after the New York Jets game and I'll say it again; if you watched last night's game and don't think that Johnny Manziel is an NFL quarterback in some capacity then I don't know what to tell you. Intelligence, arm strength, accuracy, improvisational skills...they were on display. Was it a polished product? Of course not. However, at 22 years old and in consideration from last year's improvement to this year, I'll take my chances with developing Manziel going forward.

    What I find amusing is that the critical narrative of Manziel continues to evolve. Last year we heard that Johnny would be out of the NFL within two years. Then, Johnny might be a backup quarterback. Now, Johnny has some work to do before becoming a serviceable starting QB. Hopefully, next we'll hear those questioning if Johnny can be a playoff quarterback and then if he can be elite and then if he can win a Superbowl.

    So...would I prefer to have Manziel start going forward? Selfishly, yes. But if I were patient I'd completely agree with others including BDU who rightfully point out that trotting JM2 out every Sunday to take a beating and throw fastballs careening off of elves might not tell us much, if anything, about his long-term potential within a productive team environment that we hope to foster going forward.

    Johnny wont be in football 2 years from now.. get over it.
    " There are no old running QB's in the NFL " ~ Sam Rutigliano. "
    I pray someone takes a stack of SPARQ stats, and shoves them up smug Sashi Browns tight asshole" ~TBPP



    Its Offense baby!!!!!" "ITS
    OFFENSE!!!!!

  4. #244
    brownsdownunder's Avatar
    brownsdownunder is offline Fuck Cancer! R.I.P Sean Webb I am a Golden God!!
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    13,383
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I was watching the NFL Network coverage where Marshall Faulk had his say about Pettine's comments regarding Johnny making plays in the pocket and my jaw hit the fucking floor.

    It was painfully obvious the the context was - Johnny is making plays outside the pocket, but he also needs to make them from inside the pocket.

    That somehow got translated to - Pettine says Johnny isn't allowed to make plays outside the pocket and must remain in the pocket 100% of the time and is never allowed to leave it under any circumstance ever. He cannot run from pressure, he cannot use his legs if the opportunity is there, he's just not allowed to do it.

    Only in Cleveland could that shit happen. All that went though my head was Bill Belichick standing at a press confidence and saying "Tom Brady isn't allowed to make plays from the pocket. You can't make plays unless you leave the pocket otherwise they don't count." and how it would make a great piss-take of Cleveland in a SNL sketch-esque setting.

    Only in Cleveland can someone suggest that perhaps a quarterback making plays in the pocket is a good thing, and that to be immediately shunned like it isn't glaringly fucking obvious that it's 100% correct. The in-game commentary mentioned Johnny's 26 (?) yard pass to Duke Johnson. It was a great play, but Duke was open the whole way. If Johnny threw from the pocket, he puts Duke one on one with a safety in open field and it's almost a sure touchdown - the same play that was a 50-something yard gain against Arizona. Instead, Johnny ran from the pocket and then threw which put Johnson over the sideline with no room for YAC.

    It was a great play by Johnny none the less, but these are the little things he needs to improve on. Pettine was totally right to point it out, and it's something Flip/O'Connell will show Johnny in the film room this week. It's not a big deal, it's one of those "Oh yeah" moments that young players have.

    That's why Pettine is done. The media and fans have gotten so rabid that suggesting a quarterback make some more plays from inside the pocket has become a bad thing, in spite of no quarterback in NFL history being considered "good" if he doesn't consistently make plays from the pocket. It's literally the one complaint anyone could have against Johnny from that game - He still needs to see things a little sooner and make those plays from the pocket. It isn't even a little incorrect to point that out.

    The other thing I noticed was how the two teams are discussed by those NFL network guys. Not once was Marvin Lewis or the coaches mentioned, they instead discussed the litany of elite talent the Bengals have across the board. They talked about their pass rushers opening up in the second half. They talked about Sanu, Green, Jones and Eifert just being uncoverable. They talked about the rushing games success, they talked about the secondary giving Johnny nothing.

    Then it came to us - Pettine, Pettine, Johnny, Pettine, Johnny. They didn't talk about how woeful the players were, they just talked about the coach. It's crazy. This was literally the best example we've had all year of the players being terrible. Tramon Williams played literally the worst game I've ever seen. We constantly got beat in coverage, we constantly let them run against a stacked box, we dropped a minimum of six or seven passes with almost all of them being for first downs, we could not get open more often than not, we missed tackles - all of that was neglected in place of blaming the coach for everything, like our issues were schematic. My favorite was a 3rd and 1 in which we blitzed eight across the line and Hill picked up like 17 because he ran between tackle and guard untouched - and people are pissed at the coach!?

    It's to the stage where Pettine is just too far gone. People have decided he's the problem. It's the same with all our coaches, really. It's why we've got like two players on this entire team from five years ago - we blame the coach, and then the new coach spends more time trying to get rid of the shit players than he does just simply coaching the fucking team. I am honestly beginning to think this cycle is never going to end.

  5. #245
    brownsdownunder's Avatar
    brownsdownunder is offline Fuck Cancer! R.I.P Sean Webb I am a Golden God!!
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    13,383
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Pett said he didn't mean on NFL Network that he wants Manziel to play from pocket all the time, just when the early read is there
    Only took an hour.

  6. #246
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    Posts
    8,090
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brownsdownunder View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It was painfully obvious the the context was - Johnny is making plays outside the pocket, but he also needs to make them from inside the pocket.
    Narrative bro, narrative. I didn't even bother to comment on it. There's no changing of mindsets there for some. No allowance for any real criticism.

  7. #247
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    2,503
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Lol.

    What pocket?

    And its becoming more and more hikarious at how much you guys are refusing to see reality.

    Pettine is all in against johnny.

  8. #248
    brownsdownunder's Avatar
    brownsdownunder is offline Fuck Cancer! R.I.P Sean Webb I am a Golden God!!
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    13,383
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greythan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Narrative bro, narrative. I didn't even bother to comment on it. There's no changing of mindsets there for some. No allowance for any real criticism.
    Eh. They're retards, so I don't hold it against them. On the bright side, they lick the windows nice and clean.

  9. #249
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4,956
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greythan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Narrative bro, narrative. I didn't even bother to comment on it. There's no changing of mindsets there for some. No allowance for any real criticism.
    It boils down to two issues bro....

    1: No one except the hardcore fanboys are saying Manziel needs to improve some things. Of course he does. Every QB does, even the fucking loser ass cheater people are jerking off in this thread. Fine, let him improve by getting behind him, naming him the starter for the rest of the season and let him get the reps in. What should have been one already. Instead we are going to head into year three WITHOUT a clear picture of if he can be the guy and if so WHAT needs to be done around him, other than the obvious to everyone except Farmer and Pettine.

    2: We are heading into year three and still have no idea what we fully have in JFF. I see a guy with enough promise to roll with it and see what is there. Instead Farmer AS WELL AS Pettine have created a situation where Jimmy needs to choose between Farmer and Pettine, Pettine and JFF or clean house on all three. Farmer is easy, the guy is absolute trash. He makes Savage and Kokinas look half competent all while making Walrus seem humble and kind compared to his massive ego. In my opinion and from what I have seen Pettine is a dumbass. That may or may not have to do with Farmer. From what I have seen Manziel MAY be able to FINALLY be the guy, or at least the guy to place hold and fix the losing around here. Pettine clearly doesn't like him. So which do you choose?

    Do we just clean house on all three? Do we keep Pettine, who has shown no inclination that he gets it, do we keep a promising but troubled QB and try to maximize that? That's what it all boils down to. If Manziel is going to have a year three then Pettine has to go. He has no idea how to maximize JF's talents nor how to build a system for him. Pettine wants a pocket passer that fits his scheme. Many HC's do. So either get a GM and a HC who can work with JF and build a system around that to roll with it or get rid of Farmer and JF and get a GM and QB on the same page with Pettine and keep running a so far shitty ass system. That's what it is boiling down to.

  10. #250
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    Posts
    8,090
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King of Kings View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    1: No one except the hardcore fanboys are saying Manziel needs to improve some things. Of course he does. Every QB does, even the fucking loser ass cheater people are jerking off in this thread. Fine, let him improve by getting behind him, naming him the starter for the rest of the season and let him get the reps in. What should have been one already. Instead we are going to head into year three WITHOUT a clear picture of if he can be the guy and if so WHAT needs to be done around him, other than the obvious to everyone except Farmer and Pettine.
    Battling the hardcore fanboys has been my personally appointed role here at BH. So, I come off a bit aggressive on the topic. I'd refer you to reviews of Manziel's performance as being "without flaw" and other related stupid shit.

    As for the broader issue you raise about playing Manziel, I agree as I've stated repeatedly over the past 14 hours.

    The one nagging question I have is: Is there some mitigating factor that we are completely unaware of regarding Manziel that has been the determinant in holding the Browns' hands thus far? I honestly can't think of a good one and its really not my bag as it starts to become a conspiracy theory of its own.

    That said, its worth considering (at least for me) before declaring Pettine, Flip, Farmer, O'Connell, and the entire organization as being stupid and shockingly aligned in their stupidity. I guess its possible. Maybe BS and others have been right all along. Maybe Pettine is purposefully holding Manziel back for some dumbass reason (Hates the kid, reminds him of a kid who kicked his ass when he was 12, whatever) or.... he's just not very bright.

  11. #251
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    15,863
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King of Kings View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It boils down to two issues bro....

    1: No one except the hardcore fanboys are saying Manziel needs to improve some things. Of course he does. Every QB does, even the fucking loser ass cheater people are jerking off in this thread. Fine, let him improve by getting behind him, naming him the starter for the rest of the season and let him get the reps in. What should have been one already. Instead we are going to head into year three WITHOUT a clear picture of if he can be the guy and if so WHAT needs to be done around him, other than the obvious to everyone except Farmer and Pettine.

    2: We are heading into year three and still have no idea what we fully have in JFF. I see a guy with enough promise to roll with it and see what is there. Instead Farmer AS WELL AS Pettine have created a situation where Jimmy needs to choose between Farmer and Pettine, Pettine and JFF or clean house on all three. Farmer is easy, the guy is absolute trash. He makes Savage and Kokinas look half competent all while making Walrus seem humble and kind compared to his massive ego. In my opinion and from what I have seen Pettine is a dumbass. That may or may not have to do with Farmer. From what I have seen Manziel MAY be able to FINALLY be the guy, or at least the guy to place hold and fix the losing around here. Pettine clearly doesn't like him. So which do you choose?

    Do we just clean house on all three? Do we keep Pettine, who has shown no inclination that he gets it, do we keep a promising but troubled QB and try to maximize that? That's what it all boils down to. If Manziel is going to have a year three then Pettine has to go. He has no idea how to maximize JF's talents nor how to build a system for him. Pettine wants a pocket passer that fits his scheme. Many HC's do. So either get a GM and a HC who can work with JF and build a system around that to roll with it or get rid of Farmer and JF and get a GM and QB on the same page with Pettine and keep running a so far shitty ass system. That's what it is boiling down to.
    I think Manziel can play if you surround him with some more talent on offense. Browns receivers are bad, can't get open and teams blitz more knowing they can cover them one on one. that, plsu the fact the team can't run the ball, kills the QB's ability to be successful. If Manziel played in Cincy's offense he'd be having a nice year!
    Last edited by AttackOffense; 11-06-2015 at 02:55 PM.

  12. #252
    brownsdownunder's Avatar
    brownsdownunder is offline Fuck Cancer! R.I.P Sean Webb I am a Golden God!!
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    13,383
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greythan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    As for the broader issue you raise about playing Manziel, I agree as I've stated repeatedly over the past 14 hours.

    The one nagging question I have is: Is there some mitigating factor that we are completely unaware of regarding Manziel that has been the determinant in holding the Browns' hands thus far? I honestly can't think of a good one and its really not my bag as it starts to become a conspiracy theory of its own.
    Flip.

    People forget that McCown is Flip's guy. Flip is also in his first year, perhaps he feels a lot more comfortable with a highly intelligent veteran leading the offense. I know Flip likes Johnny, but Johnny is prone to going off script and it's also hard for Flip to know exactly how to use Manziel right now given they've only just started their working relationship.

    People are so quick to say that Pettine hates Johnny, but nobody ever mentions Flip where there are a host of reasons why he might be less comfortable with having Johnny in, at least right now.

    Pettine says he expects mixed opinions when deciding who to start, and people seem to think that means "Pettine vs everyone" when Flip would have the most say when it comes to who starts at the most important position on his offense. I can't help but wonder if he's just more comfortable with McCown right now, especially when McCown is playing much better than anyone gives him credit for.

  13. #253
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4,956
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greythan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Battling the hardcore fanboys has been my personally appointed role here at BH. So, I come off a bit aggressive on the topic. I'd refer you to reviews of Manziel's performance as being "without flaw" and other related stupid shit.

    As for the broader issue you raise about playing Manziel, I agree as I've stated repeatedly over the past 14 hours.

    The one nagging question I have is: Is there some mitigating factor that we are completely unaware of regarding Manziel that has been the determinant in holding the Browns' hands thus far? I honestly can't think of a good one and its really not my bag as it starts to become a conspiracy theory of its own.

    That said, its worth considering (at least for me) before declaring Pettine, Flip, Farmer, O'Connell, and the entire organization as being stupid and shockingly aligned in their stupidity. I guess its possible. Maybe BS and others have been right all along. Maybe Pettine is purposefully holding Manziel back for some dumbass reason (Hates the kid, reminds him of a kid who kicked his ass when he was 12, whatever) or.... he's just not very bright.
    I wouldn't say they are all stupid, I would however say Farmer IS a dumb son of a bitch and Pettine is limited as a HC. Stupid? Probably not, but it's more of yet another GM drafting guys the HC doesn't want and another HC unable to adapt for that. We can keep Pettine and all that comes with him but I would prefer FINALLY getting a staff all on the same page, and someone else evaluating our talent.

  14. #254
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dublin, OH
    Posts
    8,090
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King of Kings View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I wouldn't say they are all stupid, I would however say Farmer IS a dumb son of a bitch and Pettine is limited as a HC. Stupid? Probably not, but it's more of yet another GM drafting guys the HC doesn't want and another HC unable to adapt for that. We can keep Pettine and all that comes with him but I would prefer FINALLY getting a staff all on the same page, and someone else evaluating our talent.
    Yeah, I got you. The mess of our GM and HC relationship over the past 16 years has been staggering. For my money? Its the HC that is the dog and the GM is the tail. Seems most really good programs operate that way where the GM's ego seems appropriately grounded. I mean it SHOULD be a behind the scenes job after all. The HC is the face of your organization, other than the players. GM's need less time at the podium and more time outsmarting the other 31 franchises to get better players.

  15. #255
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    15,863
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King of Kings View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I wouldn't say they are all stupid, I would however say Farmer IS a dumb son of a bitch and Pettine is limited as a HC. Stupid? Probably not, but it's more of yet another GM drafting guys the HC doesn't want and another HC unable to adapt for that. We can keep Pettine and all that comes with him but I would prefer FINALLY getting a staff all on the same page, and someone else evaluating our talent.
    Browns need a GM and Head Coach who fundamentally understand the importance of having an attacking offense and an attacking defense and drafting the right kind of players to play the scheme you implement. Browns are too soft on offense -- little downfield attack -- and too soft on defense.

  16. #256
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Oklahoma City, Ok.
    Posts
    1,013
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brutalfacts View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This year's class has 5 QB's comparable to Winston? You cannot be serious. If you are you are pretty much bucking the experts......and reality.
    I'm serious, Winston was a good QB in a bad QB class. The up-coming class is a very good class, yes with some QBs comparable to Winston. This is my opinion based on what I have seen. I don't know who you consider as experts, but some national media people have said as much.

  17. #257
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    15,863
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gambler View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm serious, Winston was a good QB in a bad QB class. The up-coming class is a very good class, yes with some QBs comparable to Winston. This is my opinion based on what I have seen. I don't know who you consider as experts, but some national media people have said as much.
    That's good to hear and we should take a look at it, of course. The strategic mistake Farmer made was drafting a franchise QB and not getting more talent to support him. Look around -- nearly all the other teams who have drafted top QBs also added good WRs, OLs and RBs. The goal is to make 1+1=3. The Browns made 1+ (-1) = 0.

  18. #258
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Oklahoma City, Ok.
    Posts
    1,013
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BoatShoes View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Give names of qb's worth a top 5 pick.

    Because they have to be FAR better than manziel now-because we have so many needs-the nfl needs to give us a player stamp debit card.

    Any rookie qb is going to suck on this team.

    We dont have a foundation.
    And its only going to get worse.

    We need wide recievers and pass rushers.

    Manziel has shown enough you can give him at least next year (with a real head coach) and we can build the base for a qb in the meantime.
    Jared Goff, Paxton Lynch and Connor Cook are in consideration for being the first player drafted. Before you call me an idiot. This is my opinion based on what I've seen, heard and read.
    I know JM supporters will disagree. I don't know how JM will perform the rest of the season. I hope the Browns don' t have to draft a QB, but there are more options at QB this year compared to last year.
    I really like Laquan Treadwell at receiver.
    I know the defense needs players, but that's always been the case with the Browns. Last three drafts: 6th B. Mingo, 8th Gilbert, 12th Shelton. I have no confidence in GM to draft the right players.

  19. #259
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    15,863
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gambler View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Jared Goff, Paxton Lynch and Connor Cook are in consideration for being the first player drafted. Before you call me an idiot. This is my opinion based on what I've seen, heard and read.
    I know JM supporters will disagree. I don't know how JM will perform the rest of the season. I hope the Browns don' t have to draft a QB, but there are more options at QB this year compared to last year.
    I really like Laquan Treadwell at receiver.
    I know the defense needs players, but that's always been the case with the Browns. Last three drafts: 6th B. Mingo, 8th Gilbert, 12th Shelton. I have no confidence in GM to draft the right players.
    The more I've watched Treadwell the more concerns I have. He has some trouble breaking away from DBs.

    Paxton Lynch is a wild card. He looked good against a good Mississippi defense but I just haven't see n enough of him against quality competition. He seems to make most of the throws and has amazingly excellent mobility for a QB his size. But I'm still not sure about his arm strength despite his size. Requires more study.

  20. #260
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Posts
    1,280
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gambler View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Jared Goff, Paxton Lynch and Connor Cook are in consideration for being the first player drafted. Before you call me an idiot. This is my opinion based on what I've seen, heard and read.
    I know JM supporters will disagree. I don't know how JM will perform the rest of the season. I hope the Browns don' t have to draft a QB, but there are more options at QB this year compared to last year.
    I really like Laquan Treadwell at receiver.
    I know the defense needs players, but that's always been the case with the Browns. Last three drafts: 6th B. Mingo, 8th Gilbert, 12th Shelton. I have no confidence in GM to draft the right players.
    I won't call you an idiot, because I would much rather have a healthy debate than a trolling contest.

    However, I am not gonna throw stats and stuff at you because it's a difficult endeavor to translate college talent into NFL talent. Not impossible, but difficult. I say smarts and accuracy. Does the QB know when and where to throw the ball and have the accuracy to throw it there? That's the only question I ask of a QB. Sure, it's great if he can "make all the throws" like so many college QBs, or if he is some super duper "athlete" that doesn't equal "football player." However, as long as he's not some limp wristed college sensation, does he know when and where to throw the ball and have the accuracy to throw it there? Can he read a defense without the defenders holding up cue cards?

    So, it's just my opinion that the 2016 QB Draft class is average, at best. Some of those guys may get drafted in the top 5 or top 10, but it will be because desperate teams will choose the best of what's available, not because there's a legitimate Franchise QB available.

    As it stands as of November 16th, 2015, the Browns are in line for the 1st overall pick in a QB average draft, as is always the luck of the Browns. High pick but no QB worthy of it.

    (Aside: Just like the QB position, the Browns fire and hire coaches with the timing to hire some nobody. They never, ever fire someone when a Bruce Arians, Jeff Fischer, Jack Del Rio, Andy Reid or Jim Harbaugh is available for hire. Keep Pett as a placeholder until a proven coach IS available, like I said we should have done with Crennel.)

    So, with the #1 overall pick in the 2016 NFL Draft, the Browns select DE Joey Bosa or RB Ezekiel Elliott, with my preference going to Elliott because he will score more TDs than Bosa. It's a bit of a tough call, because killing the other QB always leads to wins, but Bosa "seems" lackadaisical. He puts up great numbers, but something about his college game screams, "Surf's up, dude. Let's hit the beach."

    -Al

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •