clowney would be on a 1 year and isnt that reliable or good.We'd be sitting pretty. And - can scratch EDGE off our list of considerations at #26.
yeah, great point. that would take the pressure off a young rookie (specially with injury concerns #15?)Getting Clowney would relieve our draft pick, whatever round, from the urgency to be ready for week 1. If we can afford it, so be it.
I'd hope not. That would mean they stopped moving Garrett around and getting him advantages against RTsYes, I see this as a move to stop the run. And, I believe Lamar favors running left which would be where Clowney would hang out
I'd hope not. That would mean they stopped moving Garrett around and getting him advantages against RTs
forget clowney. diggin for every last dollar bill? blue collar cleveland fans aint down widditclowney would be on a 1 year and isnt that reliable or good.
we should still draft a high edge If not at 26 and perhaps more than 1.
Well, I am not speaking only to that scenario or carving into stone which side each would play on. I am suggesting that LJ bails to his left more than right, usually on a broken pass play or strong rush over the RT, not a designed run. Clowney is good against the run and not such a sack king. Clowney being on the other end (whichever end it is from Garrett) would be a great backstop against LJ bailing out and running for 15 yards like he does so often.I'd hope not. That would mean they stopped moving Garrett around and getting him advantages against RTs