There is no way that we are drafting him... We will most likely be picking top3, if not 1st overall.
But he is one hell of a player...
Alo, when you get a chance in your "free" time, explore this comment with me, if you will.Big Te'o fan, but I wouldn't take a non-pass rushing LB in the top ten. Too big a chance you won't get good value.
Big Te'o fan, but I wouldn't take a non-pass rushing LB in the top ten. Too big a chance you won't get good value.
However, every year -- every single year -- one or two of the "premium" pass rushers, OLB or DE, bust.
I don't think the recent track record for the top ILBs & non-pass rushing OLBs has been very strong. In fact, it's been pretty awful.Alo, when you get a chance in your "free" time, explore this comment with me, if you will.
I hear what you are saying and I understand why pass rushing is a premium at the top of the draft.
However, every year -- every single year -- one or two of the "premium" pass rushers, OLB or DE, bust. The ILB or MLB rarely flop that high.
So isn't there something to be said for drafting the player LESS likely to flop? The guy who could be your team leader for 10-15 years?
This is where the accepted draft logic fails me. Isn't the point to get the BEST player, who will play the LONGEST? If so, why not take the safest pick?
Te'o seems like not only a safe pick, but a long-term prospect with huge upside. He seems like a Ray Lewis type of impact player. I'm simply not clear on why some long, lanky OLB always gets preference, despite the higher risk.
- Aaron Curry, 4th overall, '09 -- To my eternal shame, he turned out to be mediocre at best. The other popular LB that year, Mr. Maualuga, turned out to be awful too (currently Pro Football Focus's lowest-rated ILB).
Not overlooking anyone -- I meant popular among the group of guys here. There were a lot of Curry vs Maualuga debates back at the other board: in hindsight, we were fortunate that neither ended up being our pick at #5.
A pass rusher like Clay Matthews or Brian Orakpo would've been wicked awesome. And while Laurinaitis wouldn't have been an ideal fit for Mangini's scheme, he's a good example of how you can get a very good 'backer in the 2nd round: that's another pattern worth looking at.
Thanks, Alo. Great perspective, as always. Thanks for falling on your sword on Curry but I was with you on that one, so you weren't alone, that's for sure.I don't think the recent track record for the top ILBs & non-pass rushing OLBs has been very strong. In fact, it's been pretty awful.
Let's look at some recent dudes:- Rolando McClain, 8th overall, '10 -- He's been so underwhelming in Oakland that the coaches decided to reduce his role: in the last two weeks, he's played 18/56 and 33/65 snaps.To be clear, I don't think Te'o will be bust -- he should be a very, very good pro. But is he an absolute freak like Willis or an impact cover guy, like Kuechly is supposed to be? That's very much in doubt.
- Aaron Curry, 4th overall, '09 -- To my eternal shame, he turned out to be mediocre at best. The other popular LB that year, Mr. Maualuga, turned out to be awful too (currently Pro Football Focus's lowest-rated ILB).
- Keith Rivers, 9th overall, '08 -- Injuries played a big role, but he never lived up to expectations in Cincinnati. Traded away for a 5th round pick.
- Patrick Willis, 11th overall, '07 -- Absolute stud. But some believe the guy playing next to him, NaVorro Bowman, is even better. Where'd he get drafted? 91st pick in 2010.
- AJ Hawk, 5th overall, '06 -- He's never been more than an above average player. And the other linebacker picked in the top ten that year, Ernie Sims, turned out to be one of Millen's worst picks.
If you liked Lavonte David, you'll be very fond of Arthur Brown.