- Awards
- 12
I thought sleeves had to be of contrasting color, so you cant disguise the ball.
I thought the one helmet rule was a safety thing.
I thought the one helmet rule was a safety thing.
That'd be news to me F5. And college teams change helmets like most men change underwear, and nobody is winning on ball-disguise plays.
But I truly don't know / haven't heard of such.
All the Dolans had to do after losing the series to the cubs was spend a little more money for a power hitting right handed bat and they likely would have been right back in it again. But they're
cheap and couldn't pull the trigger on any more spending
The Tribe should rename themselves The Starbucks because they are certainly bringing the soy.
I absolutely love the new Seattle Kraken stuff. Soooo much they can do with it now and for years to come. Great colors, great mascot, great slogans, great music, endless possibilities. Also, they went through 1,000 names and this was the fan #1. Just a well done job.
1. I still think the Browns can do better, not with our uni's, but with our branding. A secondary logo with a dawg (not a Disney-like "it's for the kiddos" looking thing we have now) is something that should happen.
2. The Spiders is still not there for me, and the Kraken proves you don't have to go to the past to hit it out of the park. Modern can be done well.
3. For the Indians, there is no Kraken-equivalent, for me, that I've seen. I dunno what I'd do if I were them. Baseball tends to be boring, i.e. The Nationals, so it'll be a toned down super-safe dealeo.
<iframe id="twitter-widget-0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" class="" style="position: static; visibility: visible; width: 550px; height: 501px; display: block; flex-grow: 1;" title="Twitter Tweet" src="https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1286607078719655936&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.barkinghard.com%2Fforums%2Fthreads%2F160852-This-Week-in-Browns-Uniforms%2Fpage69&partner=tweetdeck&theme=light&widgetsVersion=223fc1c4%3A1596143124634&width=550px" data-tweet-id="1286607078719655936" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
They did add Encarnacion, but dropped Napoli who had 34 hrs and 101 RBI. So they gained nothing with Encarnacion's addition. They also lost Naquin who for whatever reason they don't like much and put Brantley in coming off an injury I think. Anyway they had no intention of resigning Brantley. They could've just done that and he'd be here providing stability to a now shaky outfield.They did spend more money following the WS series loss. It was also money spent on right handed bat by signing Edwin Encarnación.
They did add Encarnacion, but dropped Napoli who had 34 hrs and 101 RBI. So they gained nothing with Encarnacion's addition. They also lost Naquin who for whatever reason they don't like much and put Brantley in coming off an injury I think. Anyway they had no intention of resigning Brantley. They could've just done that and he'd be here providing stability to a now shaky outfield.
Anyway, are you saying the Dolans are not cheap?
Making an offer to Brantley is not trying to keep him and yes the Dolans are cheap and you would be correct in saying that they do not have the financial resources. But then you say they are not cheap?They didn't lose Naquin. He is still in the Indians system today. Brantley was coming off injury and they gambled money on him coming back and playing well (he did). They added Donaldson that year too which added more salary. Yes they let Napoli walk.
Yes I am saying the Dolan's are not cheap. They haven't been for years and years. CLE spends as much to more than other small market teams. If you are looking for the Indians to be able to spend like the Yankees, Boston, or the Dodgers that's not going to happen. The Indians do not have that kind of in coming revenue to spend like that. The Indians have at times operated in the red or close to it. Let's not pretend this is back in the late 90s when the Jake was sold out every game. CLE like other small market teams has to grow it's own talent and capitalize on them while still under team control. Because once it is FA money time they do not have the financial resources to spend big on multiple players. It's why I dreed Lindors coming FA. If CLE doesn't trade him they are going to lose him. If they manage to sign him to the crazy amount he will be able to command they won't have the financial resources to put anyone around him
Oh and CLE did try to keep Brantley but they could not afford what HOU eventually paid him in FA.