Browns - Pick #36, Quinshon Judkins RB, Ohio State | Page 2 | Barking Hard

Browns Pick #36, Quinshon Judkins RB, Ohio State

I think it is a very real possibility Quinshon Judkins never wears a Browns uniform. We are talking about a criminal trial on a football forum, and I highly doubt Haslam & Co. are very enticed to hinge their reputation on the defendent's innocence. Or whatever is left of it after Deshaun Watson. It is also very telling how forceful they've been about waiting for the process to play out, outright refusing to negotiate a heavily conditioned contract. Don't rule out that there is more they're aware of.
 
Mike Hall has his charges dismissed, but still had a 5 game suspension due to the NFL's personal conduct policy violation.
You'd think Judkins will at least get that.

For Hall,
Dec 20th: charges dismissed
Dec 24th: 5 game suspension applied
Feb 3rd: reinstated

Four of the missed games were when he was on the Commissioner's Exempt list, at the beginning of the season, and then one game at the end of the year, got him to the 5 game total. Of course, we was under contract when it all happened in August 2024. Roger can't do anything to Judkins yet, so there will be no "time served on the Comish list" as time served for him.
 
A bit more on Judkins:

"In a new twist to the ongoing legal situation surrounding Cleveland Browns rookie running back Quinshon Judkins, his defense attorney has filed to waive his right to a speedy trial.

The move, filed in connection with an alleged misdemeanor charge of battery and domestic violence from a July 12 incident in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has raised eyebrows of all parties invested in the ongoing situation. As of now, there is no clear resolution in sight, with a variety of possibilities that may transpire.

A close look at the filing, brought to light by attorney Drew Davenport on X, reveals the waiver is for 175 days. This is a significant detail because, in Florida, the speedy trial limit for a misdemeanor is 90 days, while the limit for a felony is 175 days. The disparity raises questions about whether the defense is preparing for the possibility of an elevated charge. Keep in mind, while interesting, this distinction does not indicate that the charges are now felonies."

To me, this sounds like there is a real possibility of more. Rather get ahead of it.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom