Browns - Pick #144, Sheduer Sanders, QB, Colorado | Page 38 |

Browns Pick #144, Sheduer Sanders, QB, Colorado

Hers the thing the anti-Sanders croud doesn’t get. Nobody is sure he’ll work out. It’s just that most of a us feel that:

1) The (highly) most likely outcome for Watson is injury or failure. And if he succeeds, & we win like 8, he’s gone in a few months anyway. Yippee.

and

2) The pro-Sanders croud is made of anti-Watson-ites, and Sanders “at least has a chance to be the answer” people.

Heck many are pro-“whoever QB2 is, let’s try him, instead of Watson”.

All Watson has done in the last 5 years is pout, sit out, get suspended, get injured, and sucked.

So, no matter how unlikely QB2 is to succeed (Sanders or whoever), at least it’s not Watson.

And I was accepting when the trade happened.
Entering his 5th year here, no longer.

2¢

 
That's all Sanders hype machine BS. Instead of doing all that why can't we just go by the numbers.

It looked pretty even. They both had a good game and both had a bad game/half.

Monken chose Watson based on his ability to run his offense in an efficient manner. Watson was better at it.

It doesn't mean the offense is going to roll out 35 PPG. Just that there are less ME's and confusion.
 
jaydog said:
Instead of doing all that why can't we just go by the numbers.

It looked pretty even. Monken chose Watson based on his ability to run his offense in an efficient manner. Watson was better at it.
Click to expand...
Nah, Watson did not look better than Sanders at running the offense. There's some underlying factor that has Watson starting. It has nothing to do with him playing well, because so far this season he hasn't. We might not be much better with Sanders starting, but Sanders isn't #2 because #1 outplayed him.

And I don't see any Sanders fanboyism around here.
 
Martin Eden said:
There's some underlying factor that has Watson starting. It has nothing to do with him playing well
Click to expand...
rich people get used to buying their way out of mistakes. jimmy & watson both.

Support Each Other Lets Go GIF by LA vs. Hate
 
Martin Eden said:
Nah, Watson did not look better than Sanders at running the offense. There's some underlying factor that has Watson starting. It has nothing to do with him playing well, because so far this season he hasn't. We might not be much better with Sanders starting, but Sanders isn't #2 because #1 outplayed him.

And I don't see any Sanders fanboyism around here.
Click to expand...
Never said Watson looked better, but Sanders hype is working for you.
 
hammertime said:
Absolutely zero from the players. Let’s acknowledge the fact that DW is still a superior QB than Sanders…

Media is the only one pimping Sheduer…………….???
Click to expand...
I don't believe that's been proven. He certainly WAS. But STILL? We will see.

And literally NO ONE except the compliant Cleveland media is saying Watson looks anything but bad.

Again, I have nothing against Watson personally. Still feel he was a victim of Me Too. And he appears to be feeling the effects of all his knee surgeries and the two Achilles. He looks very slow to me compared to the old extremely elusive Watson. If he plays well, I'll give him credit. But I'm not expecting it.
 
Last edited:
practice? we talkin about practice yo.
only the real flames of the NFL REG season can produce gold
I believe from what I've seen on the field from #2 he can play
good football with mediocre team mates around him.#no hyperbole*.
& from the NCAA to the NFL thats all he's ever had
he will play, question is can his team play above average too? no more tip INT's!

shocked bruce willis GIF by Sky


*Hyperbole is a figure of speech that uses extreme exaggeration to make a point, add humor, or show strong emotion
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom