madmadworld
The Official TV Watcher
5-3 vs 0-1.
I strongly don't agree but I understand. even If we won he'd be benched5-3 vs 0-1.
Todd Monken wasn’t ready to name Deshaun Watson or Shedeur Sanders his starting quarterback for Sunday’s game against the Texans during his Monday video conference.
He said he watched the film and hasn’t circled back with the staff yet to make a decision.
When asked if it could go either way, he said “I answered the question.”
The throw was availabe to KC well before the pressure got to Sanders. Sanders was late with the read/throw to KC. That is also in part why KC had to stop to catch it and use his playmaker skills to turn that in to a TD.watson doesn't make those throws with that pressure. no way. not his game
our HC lost this football game. we should have received the ball with
the tired D & run it hard. If you score 1st you have the advantage. bush league
you DW guys are more confident than monk himself..NO QB DECISION YET
That is assuming they have not already determined they do not believe SS is the long term solution.Haymaker, just to be sure, you do realize I am NOT a DW guy. Then again, not SS guy either. I do, however, believe SS is the direction I would go at this point. DW has not shown anywhere near enough to warrant re-signing after this year so the Browns need to determine what they have in SS before the off-season.
wrists up is our greetingSounds like an epi of Star Trek.
I agree!I agree at this microcosm of time DW may be more stable, but he is what he is going to be. SS has 1 game under his belt in a new system and 'likely' will become more comfortable and patient over the next few games. Not saying he will be great, but DW level of play isn't a very high bar. Besides which, KC got his first TD all year...Boston got a 60 yarder...2 other passes went for more than 20. All things that haven't happened under DW at QB. Not exactly 'best' for the WRs.