Browns - Do we trade shadeur sanders? | Page 2 |

Browns Do we trade shadeur sanders?

Love is blind.
Ray Charles Laugh GIF
 
"today" perhaps but 1 start could suddenly sky rocket his value. NYG,WAS,MIA,ARI, & CHI.

we are discussing trading him.
I have never seen any QBs trade value suddenly sky rocket based 1 start. Also, 1 start does not negate film from last year or preseason.

If you are the NYG Winston on paper is a better option, and already paying. WAS has Marriota and same situation. MIA just invested in their bridge. ARI has Brissett who led the league last year in YPG passiny and have Beck to move to. CHI doesn't need anyone as Caleb injury is minor plus have two backups who are better than Sanders today
 
the internet is soaked in sanders trade talk. you guy argue "he's not good enough"
so why all the rhetoric? no way he can play, right? my take is. we don't know.



Offer a 2nd round pick
hooked on sanders? I'd take that pick so fast..
the kid from miami! 3rd rd ah,ok guy. sure until he plays..
If you are the NYG Winston on paper is a better option,
30 INT in 1 season..winston? this proves my point
willis in MIA struggled handling the ball off in the run game 1st drive. go see
some of these QB's are NOT better than sanders who won his last 2 starts.
time will tell.
 
Last edited:
the internet is soaked in sanders trade talk. you guy argue "he's not good enough"
so why all the rhetoric? no way he can play, right? my take is. we don't know.




hooked on sanders? I'd take that pick so fast..

the kid from miami! 3rd rd ah,ok guy. sure until he plays..

30 INT in 1 season..winston? this proves my point
willis in MIA struggled handling the ball off in the run game 1st drive. go see
some of these QB's are NOT better than sanders who won his last 2 starts.
time will tell.

Why anyone on internet is talking Sanders? For thr obvious, it gets clicks. Cultural popularity equals views. That's like asking why every football season the media constantly talks about the cowboys.

Beck, point being they just drafted him, with a higher pick than Sanders was taken. They ain't trading a high pick for Sanders over attempting to get ROI on Beck.

Winston, don't selectively leave out the money they have invested. 30 INT or not, they aren't trading a hugh pick for Sanders over just rolling with Winston and who ever they have behind him.

Willis, again is money they just invested in him. They ain't giving up any draft capital of meaning for Sanders.

All of them today, for the teams you named, are better options than draft pick above 5 + investment they have currently + Sanders.

CLE won it's last 2 starts. Sanders had 1 TD, 2 INTs, 280+ yards in those games combined. To go with an average QBR of 22.
 
I like how the thread started....Do we do the kid a favor?? 🙄 🙄. How bout we do what's best for the Browns whatever that turns out to be?!!
do the kid a favor usually precedes the ice pick to the temple.. :ROFLMAO:
look he could be everything monk says & no good. point is we don't know yet
perhaps that benefits us given the QB situation @ the NFL today in a
malik willis kind of way (7 throwing TD=3 years ,45m guaranteed WTF!)
as the season continues pressure will mount on these QB problem teams.
why pick on willis? he's terrible. fitz says 0-17 I see why. just awful.
again,we are discussing trading him here

 
Last edited:
I have never seen any QBs trade value suddenly sky rocket based 1 start. Also, 1 start does not negate film from last year or preseason.

If you are the NYG Winston on paper is a better option, and already paying. WAS has Marriota and same situation. MIA just invested in their bridge. ARI has Brissett who led the league last year in YPG passiny and have Beck to move to. CHI doesn't need anyone as Caleb injury is minor plus have two backups who are better than Sanders today
I'm not saying he's worth a 2nd or a 3rd. All I'm saying is if somebody makes an offer for him they can't refuse, they will trade him.
 
I'm not saying he's worth a 2nd or a 3rd. All I'm saying is if somebody makes an offer for him they can't refuse, they will trade him.
And an offer that cant be refused is going to be higher than the 5th they invested. If he is as good as you think he is:
a. CLE know he is actually as good you think he is.
b. CLE then has at minimum an excellent back up/bridge starter under a low cost contract for 2 years.

No matter how you want to try to slice it, your math just ain't mathing
 
And an offer that cant be refused is going to be higher than the 5th they invested. If he is as good as you think he is:
a. CLE know he is actually as good you think he is.
b. CLE then has at minimum an excellent back up/bridge starter under a low cost contract for 2 years.

No matter how you want to try to slice it, your math just ain't mathing
As if these Browns have ever known what a good QB looks like.
 
And an offer that cant be refused is going to be higher than the 5th they invested. If he is as good as you think he is:
a. CLE know he is actually as good you think he is.
b. CLE then has at minimum an excellent back up/bridge starter under a low cost contract for 2 years.

No matter how you want to try to slice it, your math just ain't mathing
I never said he was anything but a young backup with potential. Your comprehension isn't comprehending and don't associate your math with me.
 
And then what happens if Watson goes down? We run Gabriel out there? I liked the Green pick, but I'm not sure he's ready. Sanders isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
hey, I'd be happy to see him start tomorrow TBH but can we make a
goddamn decision on this kid? I'm not sure,does he need to shoot
lightning bolts out his butt? WTF are you waiting to see?
I think this OFF staff don't know doo-doo. can you RUN THE BALL?
that would be a great start..wk3

Vintage Vhs GIF by vhspositive


trade sanders talk is not conspiracy theory. rizzo openly says traded before
the deadline. PITT are making the same mistake set to roll into '27 not
knowing what the young QB's have got sticking with the vet who's 100% out
DUMB (& I'm an expert. ask anyone)
 
Last edited:
hey, I'd be happy to see him start tomorrow TBH but can we make a
goddamn decision on this kid?
The people who make the decision already have.
The kid is QB2 until QB1 is injured or benched.
He's one snapped hamstring or twisted ankle or similar injury from being QB1.
If the injury does happen then they get to decide how much of the playbook does he get to use.

It's QB3 and QB4 that are not fully decided.
They can't keep Lefty on an injured list indefinitely.
The depth chart:
 
Back
Top Bottom