Dorsey is not on the hot seat. That being said, if the big name coaching hire wants full control and doesn't want Dorsey ... who knows.
Something went wrong with McCarthy last time. The Browns seem to have reached out to him first, and then interviewed him, and afterwards it was reported that he was on the backburner and things were placed on hold.
During this time (DEC 30, JAN 7), the Browns were keying in on Eberflus, Flores, Stefanski, Kitchens and trying to get McDaniels in for an interview but that appears to have fallen through due to him interviewing with Green Bay.
On the same day McDaniels confirms he hasn't interviewed with the Browns (And wouldn't be able to until after the Patriots were knocked out) this is when the Browns appear to narrow it down to Stefanski and Kitchens (JAN 8).
Perhaps it is my bias, and I admit he's atop my list, but it feels like everything changed after the Browns couldn't get McDaniels in for an interview. Like that's when it came down to Kitchens and Stefanski.
All I'm saying - Won't be shocked if Kitchens isn't fired until after the Patriots are knocked out of the playoffs.
EDIT - Completely forgot to make my fucking point: If the issue with McCarthy was Dorsey, he could be on his way out of Haslam wants him. If the issue with McCarthy is that Dorsey wanted someone else who perhaps didn't get the chance to interview, it could be an already-made match.
Which might explain why the Browns opted to stick with Kitchens. Hope for a lot of carry over, take a gamble on an inexperienced guy, but not go out of your way to sign another coveted name in case an opportunity to get the original guy arises in the not-so-distant future.
Admittedly, that's a lot of fucking mental gymnastics and PGL will be proud of my conspiracy theory.