Analytics | Barking Hard

Analytics

DawgFan

In NFL HELL since 1964
For those that want some insight...this is a great read.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/24445965/player-tracking-data-next-step-nfl-analytics-revolution

Seth Walder
ESPN Analytics

It's 2021, and the NFL is on the eve of free agency. A general manager in need of coverage help is watching tape, toggling between video of two cornerbacks he's considering pursuing, and comparing them.

The reel he's watching wasn't pieced together by his coaching staff, but rather by a tool on his laptop. With just three taps on his mouse pad, the GM selects man coverage, in-cutting routes and then common receivers. And just like that, his custom film playlist is set.

The GM isn't only working off the tape, though. He also holds numbers -- new numbers -- on the cornerbacks' coverage skills. Specifically, the percentage of routes receivers were open against each in man coverage over the past season. And better yet: the chance of a completion, the expected yardage and the expected points of every route the cornerbacks covered, regardless of where the opposing quarterback actually threw the ball.

It all comes from a computer that, for lack of a better term, knows football, after "watching" every moment and every movement over the past several years.

Player tracking data is the next analytics arms race in the NFL, and it's here.

In recent seasons teams have held player tracking information on its own players, but never opponents. Earlier this offseason that changed, and the NFL is about to embark on its first season and full offseason of clubs having the full league's worth of player tracking information. And at least some believe that the edge gained by those that embrace the data will be significant.

"Make no mistake, it is going to be a separator in terms of your competitiveness, both in personnel and on Sundays," said one NFL executive, who requested anonymity before discussing how use of the new data would affect teams' strategy. "My belief is it will drastically help teams compete if they can embrace it and integrate it. [And] I think it will be more of a separator early."

The information, which the league refers to as its Next Gen Stats, is collected via RFID tracking devices in every player's shoulder pads. Many believe the player tracking data will eventually reveal significant insights that can impact teams' strategies in the offseason and on game day, the way it has in the NBA.

Next Gen's introduction to fans has begun with integration into broadcasts on TV and on NFL.com, but much of that has been focused on speed, acceleration and context-less separation. The long-term benefits of the system can reveal much more actionable information for teams, once mathematicians have been sprung on the colossal quantity of coordinates over time. Machine-learning models will eventually yield information like predicted completion rates, double-team percentages, catches over expectation, and more. Each team may soon have a vast database of play types that can produce the average yardage of a flood route concept against the Cover 3.


The size of the tag implanted in shoulder pads -- or sewn into jerseys for lighter practices -- to track player movement is that of a nickel. Courtesy of Zebra
"Scheme, and being able to predict the results from scheme," the executive said when asked where the biggest impact will eventually come from. He added that the data could allow for significant improvement in quantitative evaluation of individuals and could shine a light on individual matchup advantages, as well. Additionally, there is a health and injury-prevention aspect that could be valuable to clubs as they can track players' workloads, and some teams have installed the same system at their practice facilities. One analytics-focused former front office staffer posited that organizations might be able to use the measurement information to better understand aging.

"Teams have some real general ideas about what aging curves look like. But not every guy ages the same," he said.

Of course, in order for player tracking data to have a positive impact on any given team, that franchise has to have a desire to use it.

"I think there's interest, but there's always some healthy and some unhealthy skepticism about what it can do," said Dean Oliver, vice president of data science at TruMedia Networks, a sports analytics company. (Oliver is also a former ESPN employee).

But even beyond interest, successful implementation for most teams will require a willingness from upper management to invest in both the technology and people necessary to work with the data. One front office member floated the theory that the forward-thinking Philadelphia Eagles winning the Super Bowl could actually help convince hesitant teams that allocating more resources to analytics is a worthwhile endeavor.

Ultimately, approaches to player tracking data across the league will presumably vary a good bit from team to team. Based on an informal survey of several people in and around the league associated with analytics, a few teams are expected to be among the aggressive in their pursuit of useful information from player tracking data: the Eagles, 49ers, Patriots, Ravens, Falcons, Browns and Dolphins. One AFC personnel man said he expected "most teams" to be aggressive in trying to use the new data source.

But even among the more quant-friendly organizations, building up to a scenario in which Next Gen Stats can lead to truly advanced analysis would almost certainly take time and incremental steps. For a particular team, those steps might look something like this:

1. Some automation of tagging and filtering tape based on basic information, like which positions and players are on the field, may be possible early on. As far as insights are concerned (and putting aside workload monitoring, which some teams have been doing for years already), measurement information in the data could be useful for evaluating individuals. "What is a defensive end's burst off the line of scrimmage? How effectively can a linebacker not only drop into coverage but also change direction? Those types of things you'll be able to evaluate in a much more objective and quick fashion," the executive said.

2. Teams will build machine-learning models that will be able to classify aspects of football like route combinations, blocking assignments or coverage type. People can currently do this sort of task, but with player tracking the information should be perfectly objective, consistent and available in far fewer human hours. This should lead to more advanced tape automation.

3. With further research, those classifications will lead to new metrics and tools, like catches above expectation or a decision evaluator for quarterbacks.

4. Finally, teams may use all the aforementioned information to build predictive models -- anticipating playcalls or forecasting player performance given a type of play -- though admittedly right now it is hard to even fathom what teams' main uses for the information will be once their capabilities have reached this stage.


Could player-tracking data eventually impact the decisions made in NFL war rooms? AP Photo/Evan Siegle/Pool
In other words, teams have years of analytics work ahead of them in this realm. "It's going to be a real challenge to get this stuff integrated into ... the traditional system," the executive said.

Presumably in part because of Next Gen Stats, the league office hired Michael Lopez to the new role of director of data and analytics.

"We're a resource for teams, and teams are going to be using it. So there needs to be a level of familiarity in the league office," said Lopez, a former statistics professor at Skidmore College.

Third-party companies will play a big role in some teams' process of turning player tracking data into actionable information.

TruMedia (also an ESPN partner) has signed on a double-digit number of NFL teams to work with player tracking data, Oliver said. Some of those teams had previously worked with the company, which is owned by Jaguars executive Tony Khan, when they had access to only their own players' tracking information.

Telemetry Sports now has 11 teams as clients for its player tracking tool, per co-founder Jeremy Hochstedler, noting that most came aboard this year once all of the player tracking data became available. Hochstedler revealed one metric the company has developed: Tackle Expectation, which determines each defender's chance of recording a tackle on a run play based on pre-snap positioning and formation and the intended gap of the run. Teams could then determine how many tackles above or below expectation a defender made in a given period of time.

Machine-learning company Second Spectrum (another ESPN partner) is also working with multiple NFL teams on player-tracking data, according to its CEO, Rajiv Maheswaran.

Second Spectrum is known most for its handling of NBA player tracking analysis. The company's models can identify pick-and-rolls and off-ball screens largely without any human intervention, and that information is distributed via its Eagle Tool, which it licensed to 26 NBA franchises last season.

Both Oliver and Maheswaran believe teams that move quickly to build an infrastructure and integrate the new data into their decision-making process will build a long-term edge.

"The real thing that will happen is that while there will be an impact in Year 1, the teams who start adapting early will have like 10 times more value in Year 3 and 4 than other people who are slower," Maheswaran said.

Ben Alamar and Brian Burke contributed to this story.
 
This past summer I got a certificate from Cornell in data analytics...

I also have been working on my Python and Tableau development skills.

Alot of people dont realize.... its literally going to be used in everything... every industry.. almost every workplace...

Building usuable models for random things is really fun and useful.
 
PGL, you ought to try and combine your passions. See if you can get into sports data mining.

Im 30 now.. and even though I have a huge interest in it.. im not a math guy, and some of the stuff they do in the big time get DEEP into the weeds.

I enjoy the basics.. its fun. But when you make it super complex it gets beyond my realm.

You know the movie office space? The jump to conclusions guy? He talked to the engineers so the customers didnt have to?

Thats the realm Im more comfortable with. I understand it all, and can do it if/when Im called on.. but Im much better in that intermediary role of using it to explain to others the results when they dont understand.it.. and communicating to the analytics people the requirements in a way that makes sense to their process.

I really love doing Tableau development, its something I just got into and its super fun.

I tried to build a regression model to help me make a decision on which running backs to select in fantasy football... but theres not enough data in just raw stats to really work for that...

Which sort of leans into exac3 what youre talking about. In order for it to work... like the way the people in the industry do it, you need ALL the data. Down,distance, what he ate that day, defensive scheme, right, left, formation, defensive formation, theirs history vs formations, your history vs theirs, temperature outside... etc...

The amount of variables is CRAZY

The most frustrating thing with that, and making those predictions work in fantasy football... the number 1 thing.. is touches. The amount of touches a player gets in any game can be completely irrational and based on nothing but how the coach is feeling that day and game flow.
 
Im 30 now.. and even though I have a huge interest in it.. im not a math guy, and some of the stuff they do in the big time get DEEP into the weeds.

I enjoy the basics.. its fun. But when you make it super complex it gets beyond my realm.

You know the movie office space? The jump to conclusions guy? He talked to the engineers so the customers didnt have to?

Thats the realm Im more comfortable with. I understand it all, and can do it if/when Im called on.. but Im much better in that intermediary role of using it to explain to others the results when they dont understand.it.. and communicating to the analytics people the requirements in a way that makes sense to their process.

I really love doing Tableau development, its something I just got into and its super fun.

I tried to build a regression model to help me make a decision on which running backs to select in fantasy football... but theres not enough data in just raw stats to really work for that...

Which sort of leans into exac3 what youre talking about. In order for it to work... like the way the people in the industry do it, you need ALL the data. Down,distance, what he ate that day, defensive scheme, right, left, formation, defensive formation, theirs history vs formations, your history vs theirs, temperature outside... etc...

The amount of variables is CRAZY

The most frustrating thing with that, and making those predictions work in fantasy football... the number 1 thing.. is touches. The amount of touches a player gets in any game can be completely irrational and based on nothing but how the coach is feeling that day and game flow.

I have a feeling that technology is soon going to render a poor mathematical mind irrelevant. AI will be able to crunch the numbers in a fraction of a second - the same way simple mathematics is becoming a lesser focus because we've all got 24/7 access to a calculator on our computer, phone, watch, etc.

And I say that as someone who has always struggled greatly with maths. From high school onwards, I couldn't do it. I even dropped psychology at Uni because the maths was far too hard for me.

I know this boarders on conspiracy, but I've been reading a lot lately about how 2020-2030 is going to be the decade of the rise of artificial intelligence. The same leaps that occurred for phones and computers will occur now for AI.

Actually, our 2018 Australian of the Year was a woman who is a pioneer in quantum computing who has, um, whatever the fuck this means:

Professor Simmons’ research group is the only one in the world that can manipulate individual atoms to make atomically precise electronic devices. Her team at CQC2T is leading the world in the race to develop a quantum computer in silicon.

The only part that really matters is when she was kind enough to speak a language someone like me can understand;

“A quantum computer would be able to solve problems in minutes that would otherwise take thousands of years,” says Simmons.

Ahh, yeah, I know what those words mean!

I'll chuck a link here if anyone is interested:

https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/science-tech/unsw-scientist-michelle-simmons-australian-year

Which is ultimately fascinating for the world of sports analytics because a multi-billion dollar entity like the NFL will undoubtedly be amongst the first to trial new technology as it becomes available. Anything to gain a competitive edge.

Just how far this goes is fucking exciting.

Imagine if the NFL ever gets to a point in which computers can provide an insanely accurate draft ranking, based not only on positional skill but overall team need and talent available. Things Nickers has mentioned like heart and attitude would be the only thing coaches/front office would then need to determine.

Exciting times ahead.
 
I tried myself to get into computer science.. But my maths skills were/are so poor I couldnt suss Algebra to save my fucking soul... I have had a love/hate relationship since the time I started grade school with Math it would bring me to frggin tears... Spelling and music came natural for me... I have 3D thought process..Geometry I was respectable in... But crunching math was never kind to me...
 
Great stuff everyone. Me, I'm a math nerd. Always was. That guy that can multiply two 6 digit numbers in their head before others do it on their calculator. I know, you hate me. I get it. Anyway, I guess that is why I love analytics. It isn't just math. It is finding patterns, identifying outliers, discovering relationships between discreet data points. In other words, it is almost like mathematical detective work. Never the same thing twice.

BDU, on the atomically precise devices...basically it is a process that makes the chips so clean that there is no wasted pathways, no unintended side trips for the data...so it accelerates the data processing exponentially. Put simply, it's like having the Disney Pass for every ride in the park. No waiting, just pure fun.

With all that said, the amount of data collected by the NFL (not just stats, real data points, size, speed, etc.), teams will not be able to compete in 10 years if they aren't taking advantage of it all. In fact, the most analytical teams may just start dominating sooner than that. It's coming, like it or not.
 
I was wondering who "JW" was that people were referring to during Haslam's presser.

https://www.clevelandbrowns.com/team/front-office-roster/jw-johnson

He's also the guy who was showing the 2020 uni's to Baker, OBJ, and Jarvis, when OBJ said "all rrrrrnge".

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/bakermayfield?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@bakermayfield</a> got a sneak peek at the mockups for our new 2020 uniforms today ... &#55357;&#56384; <a href="https://t.co/Nk4qKiKcpU">pic.twitter.com/Nk4qKiKcpU</a></p>— Cleveland Browns (@Browns) <a href="https://twitter.com/Browns/status/1112836574432186368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Analytics is like the new "buzzword" in technology...in my field, we use it for asset management. We are behind, but we have spent several months putting together data points on our county owned culverts (we're up to about 800, and we know there are still more we don't even know about). Using the data collected, we can determine which culverts need to be replaced and which we can just perform basic maintenance on.

Same thing for roads/pavements - different data points can assess pavement condition (age, traffic, weather, asphalt or concrete, etc) and help us to plan proper pavement management. FHWA has been big on this for years and is starting to require state DOT's to create these data. It will eventually trickle down to local governments as we compete for federal dollars to improve our infrastructure.

Yeah, I'm a bit of a math geek too...just don't ask me to do any chemistry!!
 
Great stuff everyone. Me, I'm a math nerd. Always was. That guy that can multiply two 6 digit numbers in their head before others do it on their calculator. I know, you hate me. I get it. Anyway, I guess that is why I love analytics. It isn't just math. It is finding patterns, identifying outliers, discovering relationships between discreet data points. In other words, it is almost like mathematical detective work. Never the same thing twice.

BDU, on the atomically precise devices...basically it is a process that makes the chips so clean that there is no wasted pathways, no unintended side trips for the data...so it accelerates the data processing exponentially. Put simply, it's like having the Disney Pass for every ride in the park. No waiting, just pure fun.

With all that said, the amount of data collected by the NFL (not just stats, real data points, size, speed, etc.), teams will not be able to compete in 10 years if they aren't taking advantage of it all. In fact, the most analytical teams may just start dominating sooner than that. It's coming, like it or not.



Nano Technology is where everything is headed into the next 20 years or so.... It is about to change the world in ways you simply cannot imagine... AI will take a radical jump too... Now if we could just find some peace on this planet and work toward a common goal.. We may become something great as a species...
 
No one was saying analytics is a bad thing. It isn't and it has a place in everything these days.

With my own experiences I am currently finishing my last day at my current employer do to their poorly ran analytics and starting a new job Monday with a competitor that is a master at applying analytics to our field. In tue case where I currently work we were bought out a year ago by a large corporation in MN that has an analytics department and they have tried transitioning us into their way of doing things. The issue isthings are done very different where I live vs MN. The rules and regs are different and many other factors. Their response is always "it works just fine here in MN." You need to adjust several factors to make it work here though. The end result is their half assed Analytics and numbers crunching has cut everyones pay nearly in half, our Office loses money on most projects or barely breaks even and it will be a surprise if they even keep this Office open.

Meanwhile my new employer has been using analytics for decades and knows it in an out. Despite their Office having half the employees we do they are 3x more profitable, their pay and bonuses are double and they are growing, not shrinking.

If you apply it correctly it does work wonders.
 
The coolest thing I did with it so far was a class project for my certificate...

Where I hypothesized and proved that having a doctorate makes you a higher risk in an at fault claim payout scenario because a person injured by you.. upon discovering youre highly educated... will go after you for more money.
 
Analytics is definitely the future but I have to ask would that new rating system would have made Peyton Manning obviously better than Ryan Leaf?
Tom Brady sixth round ?
Brian Sipe round thirteen?
I know there are always exceptions to the rule but Gordon and Calloway don’t play because of there own personal demons.
Antonio Brown will play for someone next
season even though he has lost his mind!

You guys and gal have brought up a lot of great enthusiasm for analytics and number
crunching and I applaud its applications
maybe I’m just ignorant but raw data can’t give you the same results in every field it
just can’t.
I bet they analyzed Mayfield and he was as advertised.
Then life sets in and numbers go to shit.
Cross your fingers on year three or do we already know all we need to know?

I’m not trying to sound like an asshole there just seem to be intangibles that raw data can’t tell you or can it?
I’m being sincere and asking questions on how analytics is applied and can it answer
the question of character and work ethic
or is it based solely on numbers,routes,speed,agility and so on.

I totally get how it can be applied in the work force,I saw Moneyball and was amazed by how they became competitive
with a third of the payroll, again not trying to piss anyone off ,just trying to get the whole picture.
 
Back
Top Bottom